POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Minnesota House Bill 348 transfers $45.7 million for water treatment plants in Hastings

Original title: Hastings; money transferred for water treatment plants.

Last action · March 3, 2025: Motion to recall and re-refer, motion prevailed Environment and Natural Resources Finance and PolicySponsor: Tom Dippel

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

The commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency is required to transfer $45,700,000 in 2026 from the water quality and sustainability account to the for a grant to the city of Hastings. This funding is designated to predesign, design, construct, and equip three water treatment plants and associated water mains to remove PFAS from city wells. Transferred funds remain available until June 30, 2029.

Why it matters

Residents of Hastings receive dedicated funding to build three new water treatment facilities and related infrastructure, utilizing settlement funds to remove perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances from municipal drinking water sources through June 2029.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

City of Hastings

Receives a $45,700,000 grant to predesign, design, construct, and equip three water treatment plants and associated water mains.

Directly affected

Pollution Control Agency

The commissioner is required to execute the $45,700,000 fund transfer in fiscal year 2026.

Directly affected

Public Facilities Authority

Receives the transferred funds to administer the grant to the city of Hastings.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much money is being transferred for the water treatment plants in Hastings?
The bill transfers $45,700,000 in 2026.
What is the specific purpose of the funding?
The funds are for a grant to the city of Hastings to predesign, design, construct, and equip three water treatment plants and associated water mains to remove PFAS from city wells.
Until when are the transferred funds available?
The money transferred under this section is available until June 30, 2029.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Mar 3, 2025HouseCommittee
    Motion to recall and re-refer, motion prevailed Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy
  2. Feb 13, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduction and first reading, referred to Capital Investment

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

3M, Hastings, Centennial Office Building and 2 more
Organization3M“Source of settlement money referenced in section title”Map →
locationHastings“City receiving the grant for water treatment plants”Map →
OrganizationCentennial Office Building“Location of the Office of the Revisor of Statutes”Map →
OrganizationPublic Facilities Authority“Receives transferred funds to issue a grant to Hastings”Map →
OrganizationPollution Control Agency“Commissioner is directed to transfer funds”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.revisor.mn.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record