POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Arizona Legislature Urges Congress to Propose Constitutional Amendment Allowing State Regulation of Campaign Finance

Original title: campaign finance; state authority.

Last action · June 13, 2026: House First ReadingSponsor: Mark Finchem

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

The Arizona Senate and House of Representatives urge the United States Congress to propose a constitutional amendment that affirms state authority to regulate and limit campaign finance and govern election processes.

Why it matters

The measure petitions the federal government to alter constitutional distribution of authority over elections, which could eventually alter state and federal rules on political spending if Congress acts.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Citizens of Arizona

Their electoral processes and campaign finance rules could be subject to new state-level regulations if Congress adopts the requested constitutional amendment.

Directly affected

Congress of the United States of America

Receives the formal petition from the Arizona Legislature to consider proposing a constitutional amendment.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this memorial change Arizona state law immediately?
No. A is a formal request directed to the federal government and does not enact new state statutes or alter existing state campaign finance laws on its own.
What is the primary action requested by the memorial?
It asks the United States Congress to propose a constitutional amendment that would allow states to regulate and limit campaign finance and govern their own election processes.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This resolution did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate · in the House.

Procedural history

9 actions
  1. Jun 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House First Reading
  2. Feb 23, 2026House
    Transmit to House
  3. Feb 19, 2026SenateFloor
    PASSED
  4. Feb 2, 2026Senate
    PFC
  5. Jan 26, 2026SenateCommittee
    DP
  6. Jan 15, 2026Senate
    W/D
Show 3 earlier actions
  1. Jan 14, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Second Reading
  2. Jan 12, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate First Reading
  3. Dec 29, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Prefiled

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Supreme Court of the United States, Mark Finchem, Congress of the United States of America and 3 more
OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States“Court whose past rulings equated unlimited election spending with free speech”Map →
PersonMark Finchem“Senator who introduced SCM 1003”Map →
OrganizationCongress of the United States of America“Recipient of the memorial urging a constitutional amendment”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Senate“Federal legislative chamber whose President and Minority Leader receive copies”Map →
OrganizationUnited States House of Representatives“Federal legislative chamber whose Speaker and Minority Leader receive copies”Map →
PersonSecretary of State of the State of Arizona“Responsible for transmitting copies of the Memorial to federal leadership”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.azleg.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance25
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record