California AB 395 requires schools and state agencies to avoid scheduling events on religious or cultural holidays
September 4, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently Unknown. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Version history & redline
6 versions on fileOfficial version history is partial: 6 linked texts are unavailable or incomplete. Source links remain available below.
The text diff for this stage has not been computed yet.
OpenStates mirror retained for redline only; official linked text was unavailable
The Frame
This measure changes how public institutions manage their calendars, potentially shifting academic and meeting schedules to accommodate diverse religious and cultural observances for students, faculty, and the general public.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Public school students and families
Their academic calendars and graduation dates may be adjusted to avoid conflicts with religious or cultural observances.
California public higher education institutions
These institutions must implement new scheduling procedures and consult with student and faculty organizations.
State and local government agencies
They are required or encouraged to adjust meeting schedules to avoid conflicts with religious or cultural observances.
Last recorded activity September 4, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Why It Matters
This measure changes how public institutions manage their calendars, potentially shifting academic and meeting schedules to accommodate diverse religious and cultural observances for students, faculty, and the general public.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill apply to private schools?
What happens if an institution schedules an event on a religious holiday?
Are specific holidays listed in the bill?
News Coverage
Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check
Lobbying Activity
LOWRY STRATEGIES
on behalf of LUNAR LANDING DAY PROJECT(FORMERLY REPORTED AS ROBERT R SLATER)
on behalf of SHAMUS WRIGHT
ANDRIA WINTERS
on behalf of MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expansion of Open Meeting Act considerations
The bill extends the spirit of the Bagley-Keene and Brown Acts by explicitly linking public access to the ability to attend meetings without religious or cultural scheduling conflicts.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools