Zoning Modification Request for Livingston Ave & Sinclair Hills Rd

Original title: Application Number: MM 24-1141 Applicant: TODD PRESSMAN Location: SW Corner of Livingston Ave & Sinclair Hills Rd. Folio Number: 34476.0000 & 34497.0000 Acreage: 0.9 acres, more or less Comprehensive Plan: RES-6 Service Area: Urban Community Plan: None Existing Zoning: PD (06-1564) Request: Major Modification to PD RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Hearing Master: Denial Development Services: Not Supportable Planning Commission: Inconsistent with Plan

Record date · October 7, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document outlines a failed application by Todd Pressman to modify the zoning for a 0.9-acre property located at the southwest corner of Livingston Avenue and Sinclair Hills Road. The request was rejected by multiple local planning and development authorities.

Why it matters

The proposed zoning change for this 0.9-acre site was denied, meaning the property must continue to operate under its existing Planned Development (PD) zoning designation.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Todd Pressman

The applicant's request for a zoning modification was denied, maintaining the existing land use restrictions on the property.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was the zoning change approved?

No, the application for a major modification to the zoning was denied.

Why was the application denied?

The Zoning Hearing Master recommended denial, Development Services found it not supportable, and the Planning Commission determined it was inconsistent with the .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Follow the record

Votes, people, money & the original source

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Failed.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Uniform Rejection

The application faced unanimous opposition from the Zoning Hearing Master, Development Services, and the Planning Commission, indicating a strong conflict with current local planning policy.

Zoning Hearing Master Development Services Planning Commission