POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Local Impact

Code Enforcement Case: 6312 Bolander Terrace

Original title: (GW), Sanchez Alismayda Nieto (E Life Est), 6312 Bolander Terrace 59-1(c)(1) NPCC - Allowed parking (Two vehicles parked on front lawn.)

Record date · December 11, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

This document outlines a code enforcement case regarding a property at 6312 Bolander Terrace for an alleged parking violation. The property owner is listed as Sanchez Alismayda Nieto.

Why it matters

The property owner faces a formal hearing regarding a violation of local code 59-1(c)(1) for parking two vehicles on the front lawn.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Sanchez Alismayda Nieto

The property owner is the subject of the code enforcement hearing and potential penalties.

Key Facts

  • The case is filed under number CECASE-25-01008.
  • The property is located at 6312 Bolander Terrace.
  • The property owner is identified as Sanchez Alismayda Nieto.
  • The alleged violation is under code 59-1(c)(1) NPCC regarding allowed parking.
Show all 7 facts
  • The specific violation cited is having two vehicles parked on the front lawn.
  • The case is currently in draft status as a 1st Hearing Case.
  • The case was introduced on October 21, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the violation at 6312 Bolander Terrace?
The property is cited for having two vehicles parked on the front lawn, which is alleged to be in violation of code 59-1(c)(1).
What is the status of this case?
The case is currently a draft for a first hearing.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance10
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy5
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record