The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.West Virginia Bill 5436 classifies police canines as law enforcement officers and applies felony penalties for harming them
Last action · February 11, 2026: To House JudiciarySponsors: Laura Kimble and 7 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
House Bill 5436 classifies police canines and other law enforcement animals as law-enforcement officers while they are actively working or resting in the field. Under this measure, crimes committed against these animals carry the same penalties as crimes committed against human law-enforcement officers, and human officers are authorized to use the same level of force to defend them.
The bill changes criminal penalties by extending protections traditionally reserved for human officers to police animals, meaning individuals who injure or kill a working police canine face felony assault or charges carrying prison sentences ranging from two to fifteen years.
- House Bill 5436 was introduced during the 2026 Regular Session of the West Virginia Legislature and referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Law enforcement officers
Human officers are explicitly authorized to use defensive force to protect working police animals equivalent to the force used to defend another human officer.
Police canines
Working animals gain inclusion in the definition of law-enforcement officers, tying crimes committed against them to the same penalties as crimes against human officers.
Individuals accused of crimes against police animals
Individuals who commit offenses against working police animals face identical criminal penalties and prison sentences as those applied for offenses against human officers.
Key Facts
- House Bill 5436 explicitly includes animals trained to assist law enforcement, including canines, in the definition of law-enforcement officers while working or resting in the field with a human officer.
- Human officers are granted the freedom to use whatever force they would use to defend another human officer when defending an animal working as a law enforcement officer.
- Animals working as law enforcement officers are not state employees and receive no administrative protections or personnel status.
- All crimes committed against an animal acting in its capacity as a law enforcement officer carry the same penalties as those committed against a human law enforcement officer.
Show all 8 facts
- Malicious assault against a law-enforcement officer or canine carries a penalty of confinement in a state correctional facility for not less than three nor more than 15 years.
- Unlawful assault against a protected officer or canine carries imprisonment for not less than two nor more than five years.
- Battery against a protected officer or animal is a misdemeanor punishable by up to $500 fine and/or one year in jail for a first offense, with felony penalties for subsequent offenses.
- Assault against a protected officer or animal is a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and/or a $200 fine.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill make police canines state employees?
What level of force can a human officer use to protect a working police canine?
What penalties apply to harming a police canine under this measure?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
4 actions- Feb 11, 2026HouseCommitteeTo House Judiciary
- Feb 11, 2026HouseIntroducedIntroduced in House
- Feb 11, 2026HouseCommitteeTo Judiciary
- Feb 11, 2026HouseIntroducedFiled for introduction
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Extension of Law Enforcement Status to Animals
The bill integrates working animals into chapters 30 and 61, effectively equating attacks on police canines to assaults on human officers.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.wvlegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
- Controversy25Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
