The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Minnesota allocates $5.2 million in state bonds for Carey Lake Recreation Area improvements in Hibbing
Last action · February 10, 2025: Introduction and first reading, referred to Capital InvestmentSponsor: Spencer Igo
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Hibbing; Carey Lake Recreation Area improvement funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.
Provides $5.2 million in state funding to upgrade public recreational infrastructure, park roads, campgrounds, beaches, and trail networks in Hibbing, financed through the issuance of .
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
City of Hibbing
Receives a $5,200,000 state grant to design and construct park and recreation area improvements.
Recreation Area Visitors
Gain access to upgraded park facilities, trails, campgrounds, and beach areas.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much money is appropriated for the Carey Lake Recreation Area?
Who receives the grant funds?
What specific improvements are funded?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Feb 10, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduction and first reading, referred to Capital Investment
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.revisor.mn.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools