The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Emergency Contract for Building Supplies (Contract 23631)
Record date · April 16, 2013
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document records an awarded to E. E. Bailey Building Materials & Supplies, Inc. for the provision of miscellaneous building supplies to the Chicago Department of General Services.
The city authorized a $55,266.70 credit adjustment to a contract for emergency building supplies, impacting the city's procurement budget for the Department of General Services.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
E. E. Bailey Building Materials & Supplies, Inc.
The company is the vendor responsible for supplying materials under this emergency contract.
Dept of General Services
The department is the recipient of the building supplies and the entity managing the contract.
Key Facts
- The contract is identified as number 23631.
- The contract is classified as an emergency contract for miscellaneous building supplies.
- The award amount is listed as -$55,266.70.
- The contract was approved on April 16, 2013.
Show all 6 facts
- The vendor is E. E. Bailey Building Materials & Supplies, Inc., located in Chicago, IL.
- The Department of General Services is the primary city agency involved.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this contract?
Why is the dollar amount negative?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Negative Contract Value
The contract amount is listed as a negative value, suggesting a financial adjustment or credit rather than a new expenditure.
Connected Entities
Sources
data.cityofchicago.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance30How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
