POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HRES122FEDERALpassed_chamber
Passed

House Rules for Debating H.R. 77 (Midnight Rules Bill)

Original title: Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 77) to amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide for en bloc consideration in resolutions of disapproval for "midnight rules", and for other purposes.

February 10, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed

Current status: passed_chamber.

Last action
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.Feb 11, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

This resolution dictates the specific time limits and debate structure for H.R. 77, which, if passed, would allow Congress to group multiple resolutions of disapproval for federal regulations together for a single vote.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

House Judiciary Committee

The chair and ranking minority member are tasked with controlling the one hour of debate on the bill.

Federal Agencies

Agencies issuing regulations near the end of an administration's term may face a different process for congressional review if H.R. 77 is enacted.

What changed

Current stage: passed_chamber.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

H. Res. 122 sets the procedural rules for the U.S. House of Representatives to debate and vote on H.R. 77, a bill that changes how Congress reviews 'midnight rules'—regulations finalized by an outgoing administration.

Key Facts

  • H. Res. 122 authorizes the House to proceed with the consideration of H.R. 77.
  • All points of order against the consideration of H.R. 77 are waived.
  • The bill will be considered as read.
  • All points of order against provisions within H.R. 77 are waived.
  • Debate is limited to one hour, to be divided equally between the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.
  • The resolution allows for one motion to recommit the bill.
  • The previous question is considered ordered on the bill and any amendments, moving the bill directly to a final passage vote after the allotted debate.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a 'midnight rule'?
The document refers to regulations finalized by an administration during the final months of its term.
What does 'en bloc' mean in this context?
It refers to the ability to consider and vote on multiple resolutions of disapproval for federal rules as a single group rather than individually.
How much time will the House spend debating this bill?
The resolution limits debate to one hour total, split equally between the majority and minority leadership of the Judiciary Committee.

Why It Matters

This resolution dictates the specific time limits and debate structure for H.R. 77, which, if passed, would allow Congress to group multiple resolutions of disapproval for federal regulations together for a single vote.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Voting Record

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Streamlining Rule Disapproval

The underlying bill (H.R. 77) aims to change the Congressional Review Act process to allow for grouped (en bloc) disapproval of federal regulations.

Connected Entities

personMrs. FischbachMember of the Committee on Rules who reported the resolution.Map →
organizationCommittee on the JudiciaryThe committee whose chair and ranking member will control the debate time.Map →
organizationCommittee on RulesThe committee responsible for reporting this resolution.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record