Proposed Security Details for Governor and Lieutenant Governor Candidates
March 13, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The bill would have established a permanent state-funded security mandate for gubernatorial and lieutenant gubernatorial nominees, shifting the responsibility and cost of candidate protection from individual campaigns to the Department of Law Enforcement.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Department of Law Enforcement
The department would have been mandated to provide and manage protective security details for gubernatorial and lieutenant gubernatorial nominees.
Major political party nominees for Governor and Lieutenant Governor
These individuals would have received state-funded protective security details during the election period.
Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who would have been eligible for this security detail?
When would the security protection have started?
Did this bill become law?
Why It Matters
The bill would have established a permanent state-funded security mandate for gubernatorial and lieutenant gubernatorial nominees, shifting the responsibility and cost of candidate protection from individual campaigns to the Department of Law Enforcement.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Passage, Third Reading
Total
117
Yes
116
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
1
Abstain
0
How they voted (117)
James Buchanan
Republican · yes
Traci Koster
Republican · yes
Alex Rizo
Republican · yes
Yvonne Hinson
Democratic · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · yes
Nan Cobb
Republican · yes
Michael Owen
Republican · yes
Michele Rayner
Democratic · yes
Mike Gottlieb
Democratic · yes
Paula Stark
Republican · yes
Kiyan Michael
Republican · yes
Bill Conerly
Republican · yes
Felicia Robinson
Democratic · yes
Jennifer Canady
Republican · yes
Daniel Perez
Republican · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · yes
Kim Kendall
Republican · yes
Nathan Boyles
Republican · yes
Marie Woodson
Democratic · yes
Kim Daniels
Democratic · yes
Demi Busatta
Republican · yes
Dana Trabulsy
Republican · yes
Fentrice Driskell
Democratic · yes
+ 93 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
State-funded candidate security
The bill represented an attempt to formalize state-provided security for candidates, moving away from reliance on campaign-funded security.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools