POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri House Bill 2162 establishes a post-consumer paint recycling program funded by a producer assessment fee

Original title: PAINT RECYCLING

Last action · May 7, 2026: Placed Back on Formal Perfection Calendar (H)Sponsors: David Dolan and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 2162 requires producers to establish a post-consumer paint collection and recycling program managed by a or individual producers. The program is funded by a per-container added to paint sales, and producers must submit a comprehensive plan to the Department of Natural Resources by specified deadlines. Retailers are prohibited from selling paint from producers not participating in the approved program starting January 1, 2028, or six months after plan approval.

Why it matters

Residents purchasing will see a cost increase per container due to the added , while gaining access to statewide collection sites ensuring that at least 90 percent of Missouri residents have a site within a fifteen-mile radius or scheduled collection events.

Background
  • House Bill 2162 was introduced during the 2026 Regular Session of the Missouri General Assembly by Representative David Dolan. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Architectural paint producers

Producers must establish or join a representative organization, submit a collection program plan, pay department administrative fees, add assessment fees to paint prices, and submit annual reports.

Directly affected

Paint retailers and distributors

Retailers are prohibited from selling paint from non-participating producers after implementation and may voluntarily serve as collection sites without being required to file fees or sales data.

Directly affected

Generators of household wastes and conditionally exempt small quantity generators

Generators may transport or send architectural paints to approved paint collection sites without being charged an additional disposal amount.

Directly affected

Department of Natural Resources

The department is tasked with reviewing and approving program plans, establishing administrative fees to cover its full oversight costs, maintaining website listings, and enforcing compliance.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How will the paint recycling program be funded?
The program is funded by a per-container '' added to sold in the state by producers, which is verified by an independent financial auditor to ensure costs do not exceed program needs.
Are paint retailers required to take back old paint?
A paint retailer is only authorized as a paint collection site if the retailer voluntarily agrees to act as such and complies with applicable laws and regulations.
What happens if a retailer sells paint from a producer not participating in the program?
After the program is implemented, no producer or retailer may sell or offer for sale in Missouri unless the producer or brand is participating in the approved program listed on the department's website.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently on floor. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Passed.

Procedural history

16 actions
  1. May 7, 2026House
    Placed Back on Formal Perfection Calendar (H)
  2. Apr 28, 2026House
    Placed on the Informal Perfection Calendar (H)
  3. Apr 20, 2026House
    Placed Back on Formal Perfection Calendar (H)
  4. Apr 7, 2026House
    Placed on the Informal Perfection Calendar (H)
  5. Feb 23, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported Do Pass (H)
  6. Feb 23, 2026HouseCommittee
    Voted Do Pass (H)
Show 10 earlier actions
  1. Feb 23, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  2. Feb 12, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Rules - Administrative(H)
  3. Feb 4, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported Do Pass (H)
  4. Feb 3, 2026HouseCommittee
    Voted Do Pass (H)
  5. Feb 3, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  6. Jan 29, 2026House
    Public Hearing Completed (H)
  7. Jan 8, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Conservation and Natural Resources(H)
  8. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  9. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  10. Dec 4, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Shift to Producer Responsibility

The legislation shifts the responsibility for post-consumer architectural paint waste management entirely onto producers and representative organizations rather than local government waste programs.

Connected Entities

Department of Natural Resources, Bill Irwin, Joseph Engler and 1 more
OrganizationDepartment of Natural Resources“State department responsible for approving plans, enforcing compliance, and esta”Map →
PersonBill Irwin“Representative for District 055, cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk of the House”Map →
PersonDavid Dolan“Representative for District 148, introduced House Bill 2162”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record