POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofZoning →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Zoning Modification Request for 11.74 Acres at Cypress Lane

Original title: Application Number: MM 24-1152 Applicant: TYLER HUDSON & GARDNER BREWER HUDSON, P.A. Location: NW Corner of Cypress Ln. Folio Number: 14015.0100 & 14084.0130 Acreage: 11.74 acres, more or less Comprehensive Plan: NMU-4 Service Area: Rural Community Plan: Lutz Existing Zoning: PD (03-0348) Request: Major Modification to PD RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Hearing Master: Denial Development Services: Approvable, Subject to Conditions Planning Commission: Consistent with Plan

Record date · July 22, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document outlines a major zoning modification request (MM 24-1152) for an 11.74-acre property located at the northwest corner of Cypress Lane in Lutz. The application seeks to modify an existing Planned Development (PD) zoning designation.

Why it matters

The decision determines the allowed land use and development standards for an 11.74-acre site in the Lutz community, impacting future construction and site usage.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Property Owners/Applicants

The applicants are seeking a change in zoning regulations that govern the use of their 11.74-acre property.

Indirectly affected

Lutz Community Residents

Residents in the vicinity may be affected by changes to land use and development standards on the subject property.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is being requested for the property on Cypress Lane?
The applicant is requesting a to the existing Planned Development (PD) zoning for the 11.74-acre site.
What do the different government bodies recommend?
The Zoning Hearing Master recommended denial, Development Services recommended approval with conditions, and the Planning Commission found the request consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Conflicting Administrative Recommendations

The document shows a rare split where the Zoning Hearing Master recommended denial while Development Services recommended approval, suggesting complexity in the application's compliance.

Connected Entities

Tyler Hudson, Gardner Brewer Hudson, P.A., Lutz and 2 more
locationLutz“Community where the property is located.”Map →
locationCypress Lane“Location of the subject property.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record