POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proposed Study for Monterey Bay National Heritage Area

Original title: Monterey Bay National Heritage Area Study Act

Record date · December 17, 2024

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to evaluate whether specific regions in California should be officially designated as a . The study will determine if the area meets federal criteria for heritage, conservation, and cultural significance.

Why it matters

If the study concludes the area is suitable and feasible, it could lead to future federal recognition and potential funding for the Monterey Bay region, impacting land management and cultural preservation efforts in Monterey, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, and San Luis Obispo counties.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Residents of Monterey, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, and San Luis Obispo counties

The study will evaluate their local land for potential federal designation as a National Heritage Area.

Directly affected

Tribal governments in California

The Secretary of the Interior is required to consult with them as part of the study process.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill automatically create a National Heritage Area?
No. This bill only authorizes a study to determine if such a designation is suitable and feasible.
Which counties are included in the study?
The study covers Monterey, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, and San Luis Obispo counties, plus adjacent areas with similar heritage characteristics.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Regional Heritage Expansion

The bill explicitly allows for the inclusion of adjacent areas beyond the four named counties if they share similar heritage characteristics, suggesting a flexible geographic scope for the study.

Connected Entities

54, California, Mr. Mullin and 9 more
dollar amount54“title of United States Code”Map →
locationCalifornia“state where the proposed National Heritage Area is located”Map →
PersonMr. Mullin“supported the bill”Map →
PersonMr. Carbajal“supported the bill”Map →
PersonMs. Lofgren“supported the bill”Map →
bill numberH.R. 10460“bill number”Map →
PersonMr. Panetta“introduced the bill”Map →
locationMonterey Bay“proposed National Heritage Area”Map →
dateDecember 17, 2024“date the bill was introduced”Map →
dollar amount10460“bill number”Map →
dollar amount120103“section of title 54, United States Code”Map →
PersonMs. Eshoo“supported the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record