POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut creates contingency special education grants and bans private equity-owned special education providers

Original title: AN ACT CONCERNING THE CREATION OF A CONTINGENCY SPECIAL EDUCATION GRANT, A PROHIBITION ON PRIVATE EQUITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A WORKING GROUP TO CONSIDER INNOVATIONS IN THE PROVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES.

Last action · February 27, 2026: Public Hearing 03/04Sponsor: John Kissel

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Connecticut establishes a contingency special education grant for unanticipated mid-year student enrollments starting July 1, 2026, while prohibiting the State Board of Education from approving private equity-owned special education providers. Additionally, the measure creates a working group to study public-private partnerships and private provider eligibility, requiring a report by January 1, 2027.

Why it matters

Local school districts gain a dedicated funding stream for high-cost students enrolling after March 1, but must exclude private equity-backed providers from state approval, altering the market of available specialized educational vendors.

Background
  • Connecticut statutory framework governs special education grants to towns through calculations involving net costs of special education and base aid ratios under section 10-76g. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

local or regional boards of education

Eligible to receive contingency grants for unanticipated special education costs incurred after March 1.

Directly affected

private providers of special education services

Subject to a statutory prohibition on state approval if owned or operated by a private equity company.

Directly affected

students requiring special education or related services

Experience changes in how school districts receive funding for late-year enrollments and transition from birth-to-three services.

Key Facts

  • Commencing July 1, 2027, the State Board of Education must pay a contingency special education grant on a current basis for students who enroll or lose birth-to-three eligibility on or after March 1 and require costs exceeding two times net current expenditures per student.
  • Effective July 1, 2026, the State Board of Education is prohibited from approving any private provider of special education services that is owned or operated by a private equity company.
  • A private equity company is defined as an asset class consisting of equity securities and debt in operating companies that are not publicly traded on a stock exchange.
  • The Commissioner of Education must convene a working group by July 1, 2026, to examine innovations in special education through public-private partnerships and expansion of private provider eligibility.
Show all 6 facts
  • The working group must include at least one representative from an approved private provider and at least one from an ineligible private provider.
  • The working group must submit a report on its findings and recommendations to the education committee of the General Assembly not later than January 1, 2027.

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggers eligibility for the new contingency special education grant?
A local or regional board of education becomes eligible when a student enrolls in the school district or becomes ineligible for birth-to-three services on or after March 1 of the school year, requires special education, and incurs costs exceeding two times the for each student.
Are all private special education providers banned under this bill?
No. The bill only bans private providers that are owned or operated by a , defined as operating companies not publicly traded on a stock exchange.
What is the deadline for the special education working group to report its findings?
The working group must submit its report and recommendations to the General Assembly's education committee not later than January 1, 2027.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 27, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/04
  2. Feb 26, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Education

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Private Equity Restriction in Education

The state establishes a clear statutory prohibition against private equity ownership among approved private special education providers.

Connected Entities

Commissioner of Education, State Board of Education, Department of Education and 1 more
PersonCommissioner of Education“Convened to select a working group and submit a report”Map →
OrganizationState Board of Education“Required to pay contingency grants and prohibited from approving private equity ”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Education“Prohibited from approving private equity-owned providers”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Receives the working group report through its education committee”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record