Congressional Resolution Supporting Law Enforcement
May 7, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Current status: passed_chamber.
Version history & redline
2 versions on fileThe Frame
This resolution serves as a formal statement of Congressional intent and political positioning regarding national law enforcement policy, though it does not change federal law or funding.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Law enforcement officers
The resolution serves as a formal expression of Congressional support for their professional role.
Local law enforcement agencies
The resolution addresses the impact of sanctuary city policies on their resource allocation.
Current stage: passed_chamber.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The resolution formally expresses Congressional appreciation for the daily contributions of law enforcement officers.
- The resolution recognizes the personal sacrifices made by law enforcement officers in the line of duty.
- The resolution declares official Congressional support for the men and women of law enforcement.
- The text criticizes 'leftist activists and progressive politicians' for policies aimed at defunding or dismantling police departments.
- The text criticizes 'sanctuary city policies' for restricting cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
- The resolution credits the Trump administration's focus on 'law and order' for a decline in homicide rates.
- The resolution notes a decline in drug overdose deaths to levels not seen since 2019.
- The resolution notes a decline in violent crime rates in major U.S. cities.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this resolution change federal law?
What is the purpose of this document?
Why It Matters
This resolution serves as a formal statement of Congressional intent and political positioning regarding national law enforcement policy, though it does not change federal law or funding.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Total
409
Yes
240
No
169
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (409)
Greg Landsman
D · yes
Nicholas Langworthy
R · yes
Kathy Castor
D · yes
David Valadao
R · yes
Carlos Gimenez
R · yes
Zoe Lofgren
D · no
Gilbert Cisneros
D · no
Bruce Westerman
R · yes
André Carson
D · no
Paul Tonko
D · no
Joe Neguse
D · no
Kevin Hern
R · yes
Gary Palmer
R · yes
Joe Courtney
D · no
Mary Miller
R · yes
Maxine Dexter
D · no
Joseph Morelle
D · no
Barry Moore
R · yes
Rick Larsen
D · no
Deborah Ross
D · no
Nathaniel Moran
R · yes
Kevin Mullin
D · no
David Kustoff
R · yes
Troy Nehls
R · yes
+ 385 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Explicit partisan framing in resolutions
The resolution uses highly specific partisan language to link current crime statistics to the policies of a specific administration and its political opponents.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy65Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools