POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Alabama HB 265 creates criminal offenses and penalties for the unauthorized collection, testing, and transfer of DNA

Original title: Crimes and offenses; crimes of unlawful use of DNA created, criminal penalties provided

Last action · February 5, 2026: Read for the Second Time and placed on the CalendarSponsor: Ben Robbins

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Alabama HB 265 establishes new criminal penalties ranging from a Class A misdemeanor to a for intentionally collecting, testing, selling, or disclosing an individual's or genetic data without , effective October 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Residents gain legal protections over their biological samples and genetic data, making unauthorized commercial sharing, testing, or retention a punishable crime.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

individuals providing DNA samples

Individuals receive new legal protections and require clear disclosures and express consent before their DNA samples or genetic data can be collected, tested, or transferred.

Directly affected

genetic testing companies

Genetic testing companies must ensure compliance with existing state law to operate under the bill's exemptions.

Directly affected

institutions of higher education

Public or private institutions of higher education are exempt from the new restrictions when collecting, using, or retaining DNA or genetic data for noncommercial research and instruction.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What constitutes express consent under this bill?
requires a clear and prominent disclosure regarding the collection, use, retention, or disclosure of a or genetic data, and may be provided by any affirmative action demonstrating an intentional decision.
Does this bill apply to law enforcement or higher education research?
No, the bill explicitly exempts law enforcement purposes, compliance with court orders, genetic testing companies compliant with state law, HIPAA-covered entities, de-identified data, and noncommercial research or instruction by institutions of higher education.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently on floor. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Passed.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 5, 2026House
    Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar
  2. Feb 4, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported Out of Committee House of Origin
  3. Jan 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Pending Committee Action in House of Origin
  4. Jan 15, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read for the first time and referred to the House Committee on Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Creation of Tiered DNA Crimes

The bill structures unauthorized DNA activities into three distinct degrees ranging from misdemeanors for collection/access violations up to felonies for transfers and testing disclosures.

Connected Entities

House Judiciary
OrganizationHouse Judiciary“House Judiciary Reported Substitute for HB265”Map →

Sources

Open source document

alison.legislature.state.al.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record