POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

New Jersey bill restricts public records access to police body camera footage

Original title: Establishes "End Crimes to Clicks Act"; limits disclosure of body worn camera recordings under State's open public records law.

Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Public Safety and Preparedness CommitteeSponsor: Paul Kanitra

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

New Jersey restricts public disclosure of police recordings under the open public records law, permitting access only to individuals who are direct subjects of the recording or their legal next of kin.

Why it matters

Members of the general public and commercial entities lose the ability to obtain police body camera footage through public records requests, while individuals directly involved in recorded incidents retain access rights.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Law enforcement officers

Officers are directly affected because interactions captured on body worn cameras are restricted from general public records disclosure.

Directly affected

General public and commercial entities

General requesters lose access to body worn camera footage under open public records laws unless they qualify as a direct subject of the recording.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is allowed to request body worn camera footage under this bill?
Only a person who is a direct subject of the recording or the legal next of kin if the subject is deceased may request the footage.
Does this bill prevent private individuals from recording law enforcement interactions themselves?
No, the bill preserves the right of private individuals to record, publish, and disseminate recordings of interactions with law enforcement utilizing their own equipment.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly Public Safety and Preparedness Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Restriction of Open Records for Police Video

The bill carves out a specific new exemption within state open records laws exclusively for body worn camera footage.

Connected Entities

New Jersey
locationNew Jersey“State where the legislation is introduced”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record