POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah prohibits suppliers from using personal data to raise consumer prices and grants enforcement powers to the Division of Consumer Protection

Original title: Consumer Pricing Data Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: Senate/ filedSponsors: Heidi Balderree and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Suppliers in Utah are prohibited from using a consumer's personal data, , purchase history, or related inferences to increase the price of goods or services, effective May 6, 2026. The legislation establishes the Consumer Pricing Act, requiring businesses that use automated pricing systems to retain specific pricing and data records for at least one year. The Division of Consumer Protection is authorized to enforce these rules through administrative fines up to $2,500 and court actions.

Why it matters

Consumers gain legal protection against algorithmic price discrimination driven by personal data tracking, while businesses face recordkeeping mandates and financial penalties up to $2,500 per violation for unauthorized pricing practices.

Background
  • The Division of Consumer Protection operates within the Utah Department of Commerce to enforce various consumer protection statutes. context
  • Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act regulates financial institutions regarding the handling of consumer financial privacy. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers are protected from having their personal data, purchase history, or biometric information used by suppliers to increase prices on goods and services.

Directly affected

Suppliers

Suppliers must alter pricing practices to avoid using consumer data for price increases, maintain one-year records for automatic pricing systems, and face potential fines for non-compliance.

Directly affected

Division of Consumer Protection

The division gains administrative oversight, rule-making authority, fine imposition powers, and the ability to bring court actions to enforce the Consumer Pricing Act.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What records must a business keep if it uses automated pricing?
If a supplier uses an to raise prices, it must store the charged price and each category of personal data used by the system for at least one year.
What penalties can a business face for violating the Consumer Pricing Act?
The Division of Consumer Protection or a court may impose fines of up to $2,500 per violation, and courts can also issue injunctions and order the of money to compensate injured consumers.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

19 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ strike enacting clause
  3. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Senate/ comm rpt/ sent to Rules
  4. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Recommends Returned to Rules
  5. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Not Considered
  6. Mar 2, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0293S01
Show 13 earlier actions
  1. Mar 1, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0293S01
  2. Feb 26, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0293S01
  3. Feb 26, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0293S01
  4. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  5. Feb 19, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0293
  6. Feb 18, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0293
  7. Feb 17, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  8. Feb 13, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  9. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  10. Feb 13, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0293
  11. Feb 13, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0293
  12. Feb 13, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  13. Feb 13, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Division Oversight

The bill continuously integrates new regulatory chapters into the Division of Consumer Protection's enforcement portfolio, culminating in the creation of the Consumer Pricing Act.

Connected Entities

Division of Consumer Protection, Department of Commerce
OrganizationDivision of Consumer Protection“Administers and enforces the Consumer Pricing Act.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Commerce“Houses the Division of Consumer Protection.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record