POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas HB 1254 exempts in vitro fertilization, contraception, and high-risk pregnancies from abortion restrictions

Original title: Related to expanding the exemptions of abortions and Texas women's access to reproductive healthcare including in vitro fertilization.

Last action · March 10, 2025: Referred to Public HealthSponsor: Martinez Fischer

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Texas HB 1254 expands exemptions to abortion restrictions to protect , emergency contraception, s, and procedures for ectopic pregnancies or high-risk patients aged 35 and older, taking effect immediately upon a two-thirds vote or on September 1, 2025.

Why it matters

The measure alters legal liability for physicians performing reproductive healthcare procedures, allowing specific treatments such as fertility services and contraception without violating state abortion prohibitions.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Texas women

Access to in vitro fertilization, emergency contraception, and specific reproductive healthcare exemptions is legally clarified.

Directly affected

physicians

Legal liability and operational guidelines change when performing fertility treatments, contraception services, or procedures for high-risk and ectopic pregnancies.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does HB 1254 affect access to in vitro fertilization in Texas?
Yes, the bill amends the Health and Safety Code to explicitly apply exemptions to instances where or fertility treatments are used.
Are emergency contraceptives and intrauterine devices permitted under this bill?
Yes, the bill exempts the use, prescription, administration, procuring, or selling of Plan B, morning-after pills, s, or any other type of contraception.
What medical conditions qualify a patient for an exemption under Section 170.002?
Physicians are not prohibited from performing an abortion if the pregnant woman is 35 years of age or older, has a physician-determined high-risk condition, or if the pregnancy resulted from .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Mar 10, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Public Health
  2. Mar 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. Nov 12, 2024HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Reproductive Healthcare Exemptions

The bill introduces specific statutory carve-outs for fertility treatments, emergency contraception, and maternal age thresholds within Texas health statutes.

Connected Entities

Health and Safety Code, Martinez Fischer
otherHealth and Safety Code“Statutory code amended by the bill”Map →
PersonMartinez Fischer“Bill author and sponsor in the Texas House of Representatives”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record