Resolution to End National Emergency Regarding Canadian Imports
September 16, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Current status: passed_chamber.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The resolution would remove the legal basis for current tariffs on Canadian goods, potentially lowering costs for businesses and consumers who rely on Canadian imports.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Importers of Canadian goods
These businesses may see a change in the duties applied to their imports if the emergency declaration is terminated.
Canadian exporters
The termination of the emergency could alter the trade conditions for goods exported to the United States.
Current stage: passed_chamber.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Why It Matters
The resolution would remove the legal basis for current tariffs on Canadian goods, potentially lowering costs for businesses and consumers who rely on Canadian imports.
Key Facts
- S.J. Res. 77 mandates the immediate termination of the national emergency declared on February 1, 2025.
- The emergency being terminated was established via Executive Order 14193.
- The resolution is introduced under the authority of section 202 of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622).
- The resolution was introduced in the Senate on September 16, 2025.
- The resolution has 14 co-sponsors from both major political parties.
- The resolution has been referred to the Senate Committee on Finance.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this resolution do?
Does this resolution automatically remove the tariffs?
News Coverage
Voting Record
Total
96
Yes
50
No
46
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (96)
Lindsey Graham
R · no
Lisa Blunt Rochester
D · yes
Richard Durbin
D · yes
Sheldon Whitehouse
D · yes
Bernie Sanders
I · yes
Gary Peters
D · yes
Tim Scott
R · no
Timothy Kaine
D · yes
John Cornyn
R · no
Bill Cassidy
R · no
Mark Warner
D · yes
Mike Lee
R · no
Catherine Cortez Masto
D · yes
Tom Cotton
R · no
Pete Ricketts
R · no
Raphael Warnock
D · yes
Tina Smith
D · yes
Elissa Slotkin
D · yes
Joni Ernst
R · no
John Hickenlooper
D · yes
Josh Hawley
R · no
Eric Schmitt
R · no
Lisa Murkowski
R · yes
James Justice
R · no
+ 72 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Bipartisan Legislative Pushback
The resolution is notable for having a broad list of co-sponsors from both major political parties, indicating significant legislative interest in limiting the President's emergency trade powers.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz60Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools