POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Montana SB 419 revises legislative pension service credit rules and calculation methods

Original title: Revising pension laws related to service credit for legislative members

Last action · May 23, 2025: (S) Died in ProcessSponsor: Ellie Boldman

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

Revising pension laws related to service credit for legislative members

Why it matters

Changes how retirement s accrue and how pension benefits are calculated for state lawmakers in Montana, linking benefits to the earliest period of required contributions after taking office.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

members of the legislature of Montana

State lawmakers would earn service credit starting from the date they assume office and have their retirement benefits calculated based on their earliest contribution periods.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When do legislators start earning service credit under this bill?
Beginning the date a member of the legislature assumes office, for the portion of each year they pay regular contributions.
How are retirement benefits calculated for legislators under SB 419?
They are calculated using plan provisions applicable to the earliest period for which the member paid required contributions or purchased , no earlier than the date they assumed office.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

21 actions
  1. May 23, 2025Senate
    (S) Died in Process
  2. Mar 12, 2025Senate
    (S) Missed Deadline for General Bill Transmittal
  3. Mar 4, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Tabled in Committee
  4. Mar 3, 2025Senate
    (S) Hearing
  5. Mar 1, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Printed
  6. Feb 28, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Unsigned
Show 15 earlier actions
  1. Feb 28, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Received
  2. Feb 27, 2025Senate
    (S) Hearing Canceled
  3. Feb 27, 2025Senate
    (S) Hearing
  4. Feb 24, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Requested
  5. Feb 24, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Referred to Committee
  6. Feb 24, 2025Senate
    (S) 1st Reading
  7. Feb 21, 2025SenateIntroduced
    (S) Introduced
  8. Feb 21, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Delivered to Requester
  9. Feb 18, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Ready for Delivery
  10. Feb 18, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Assembly
  11. Feb 18, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review
  12. Feb 18, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Input/Proofing
  13. Feb 15, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Edit
  14. Feb 15, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Legal Review
  15. Dec 14, 2024House
    (LC) Drafter Assigned

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Ellie Boldman, Montana
PersonEllie Boldman“Primary sponsor of SB 419 in the Montana Senate”Map →
locationMontana“State where the legislation was introduced”Map →

Sources

Open source document

bills.legmt.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record