CHICAGO (COOK COUNTY)lobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: Chicago Carriage Cab Company

Original title: THOMAS J MURPHY for CHICAGO CARRIAGE CAB COMPANY @ BUSINESS AFFAIRS AND CONSUMER PROTECTION (BACP) (2014-07-01)

July 1, 2014

lobbying transportation taxi industry city government

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This document identifies the professional representation hired by a taxi company to interact with the city department responsible for regulating vehicle-for-hire services between July 1, 2014, and September 30, 2014.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Chicago Carriage Cab Company

The company is the client seeking to influence or communicate with city administrative processes.

Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection

The department is the target of the lobbying efforts regarding taxi industry regulations.

What changed

Last recorded activity July 1, 2014.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

Thomas J. Murphy registered to lobby the Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection on behalf of the Chicago Carriage Cab Company for the third quarter of 2014.

Key Facts

Lobbyist Thomas J. Murphy represented Chicago Carriage Cab Company.
The lobbying activity was directed at the Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection (BACP).
The lobbying period covered July 1, 2014, through September 30, 2014.
The stated action type for the lobbying is administrative.
The specific goal of the lobbying is identified as community interface.

Why It Matters

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this document?

This is a public disclosure record showing that a specific lobbyist was hired by a taxi company to communicate with a city department.

What does 'community interface' mean in this context?

The document uses this term to describe the nature of the interaction between the lobbyist and the city department, though it does not provide further specific details on the activities performed.