The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Proposed Federal Ban on Non-Citizen Voting in D.C. Elections
Last action · June 11, 2025: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.Sponsors: August Pfluger and 14 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
This bill seeks to prohibit non-U.S. citizens from voting in any District of Columbia elections, including s and s. It also mandates the repeal of the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022, effectively reverting D.C. voting eligibility laws to their pre-2022 status.
If passed, this bill would remove the legal right of non-citizen residents in the District of Columbia to participate in local elections, reversing the current policy established by D.C. Law 24-242.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Non-citizen residents of the District of Columbia
These individuals would lose the legal right to vote in local D.C. elections and ballot initiatives.
District of Columbia Board of Elections
The agency would be required to update voter registration and eligibility requirements to comply with the federal prohibition.
Key Facts
- The bill prohibits any individual who is not a U.S. citizen from voting in D.C. public office elections.
- The bill prohibits non-citizens from voting in D.C. ballot initiatives or referendums.
- The bill explicitly repeals the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022 (D.C. Law 24-242).
- The bill mandates that any laws previously amended or repealed by the 2022 Act be restored to their original state as if the 2022 Act never existed.
Show all 6 facts
- The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 31, 2025.
- The bill has been referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill affect voting in federal elections?
What happens to the 2022 D.C. law if this bill passes?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
17 actions- Jun 11, 2025SenateCommitteeReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- Jun 10, 2025HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Jun 10, 2025HouseFloorOn passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 266 - 148, 1 Present (Roll no. 163). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2594)
- Jun 10, 2025HouseFloorPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 266 - 148, 1 Present (Roll no. 163). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2594)
- Jun 10, 2025HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2601-2602)
- Jun 10, 2025HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 884, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Frost demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Show 11 earlier actions
- Jun 10, 2025HouseThe previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- Jun 10, 2025HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 884.
- Jun 10, 2025HouseRule provides for consideration of H.R. 884, H.R. 2056, H.R. 2096 and S. 331. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 884, H.R. 2056, H.R. 2096, and S. 331 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate for each bill. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 884, H.R. 2056, and H.R. 2096, and one motion to commit on S. 331.
- Jun 10, 2025HouseConsidered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 489. (consideration: CR H2594-2600)
- Jun 9, 2025HouseRules Committee Resolution H. Res. 489 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 884, H.R. 2056, H.R. 2096 and S. 331. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 884, H.R. 2056, H.R. 2096, and S. 331 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate for each bill. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 884, H.R. 2056, and H.R. 2096, and one motion to commit on S. 331.
- Jun 4, 2025HousePlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 106.
- Jun 4, 2025HouseReported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 119-137.
- May 21, 2025HouseCommitteeOrdered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 17.
- May 21, 2025HouseCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Jan 31, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Jan 31, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduced in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
414
- Yes
- 266
- No
- 148
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (414)
390 more members
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 10 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Federal Preemption of Local Law
The bill demonstrates a direct federal intervention to override a specific piece of local D.C. legislation (D.C. Law 24-242).
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy90Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz65Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
