The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Mississippi Legislature considers $1.9 million appropriation for Marshall County highway infrastructure studies
Last action · February 25, 2026: 02/25 (S) Died In CommitteeSponsor: Neil Whaley
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Senate Bill 3311 proposes a $1,900,000 from the State General Fund to Marshall County to cover costs for preliminary highway infrastructure improvement studies for 2027.
The measure directs state funds specifically toward local highway planning in Marshall County, drawing directly from the state's unallocated general revenues for the 2027 budget year.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Marshall County
Marshall County is designated to receive $1,900,000 from the State General Fund to conduct preliminary highway infrastructure studies.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much money does Senate Bill 3311 allocate to Marshall County?
What is the purpose of the funds allocated in Senate Bill 3311?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died in committee.
Procedural history
2 actions- Feb 25, 2026Senate02/25 (S) Died In Committee
- Feb 24, 2026SenateCommittee02/24 (S) Referred To Appropriations
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance15Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 15)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
