The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Minnesota requires health plans to cover medically necessary dental procedures resulting from cancer treatment
Last action · February 19, 2025: Authors added Falconer and Hemmingsen-JaegerSponsors: Ginny Klevorn and 5 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Minnesota s must cover medically necessary dental procedures, evaluations, examinations, laboratory assessments, medications, and treatments that are a direct result of cancer treatment, including chemotherapy, , and radiation therapy. The requirement applies to insurance contracts issued, renewed, or amended on or after the day following final enactment.
Cancer patients face new insurance coverage rules requiring s to pay for dental care and associated medical services directly stemming from chemotherapy, , and radiation therapy.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
cancer patients
Health plans must provide coverage for medically necessary dental procedures and associated services resulting from their cancer treatments.
health plans
Carriers must provide coverage for medically necessary dental procedures, evaluations, examinations, laboratory assessments, medications, and treatments resulting from cancer treatment on insurance contracts issued, renewed, or amended on or after the effective date.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What dental procedures are required to be covered by health plans?
Does the coverage include associated medical services like lab work and medications?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
2 actions- Feb 19, 2025HouseAuthors added Falconer and Hemmingsen-Jaeger
- Feb 13, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduction and first reading, referred to Commerce Finance and Policy
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Connected Entities
Sources
www.revisor.mn.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy30Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
