The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.House Resolution 405: Setting Rules for Debate on Three Law Enforcement Bills
Last action · May 14, 2025: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.Sponsor: Chip Roy
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This resolution establishes the rules for how the U.S. House of Representatives will debate and vote on three specific bills related to law enforcement. It waives standard procedural objections and sets a structure for one hour of debate per bill.
This resolution determines the legislative path for three bills concerning federal law enforcement reporting, concealed carry rights, and the purchase of retired service weapons, effectively fast-tracking them for a final vote in the House.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Federal law enforcement officers
The bills governed by this resolution concern their ability to carry concealed weapons and purchase retired service weapons.
House Judiciary Committee members
They are responsible for managing the one hour of debate time allotted for each bill.
Key Facts
- H. Res. 405 sets the rules for floor consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243, and H.R. 2255.
- All points of order against the consideration of these three bills are waived.
- Amendments recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary are automatically considered adopted.
- Each bill will be considered as read on the House floor.
Show all 7 facts
- Debate for each bill is limited to one hour, split equally between the chair and ranking minority member of the Judiciary Committee.
- Only one motion to recommit is permitted per bill.
- The resolution was reported by the Committee on Rules on May 13, 2025.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this resolution actually do?
Does this resolution pass the law enforcement bills themselves?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Current status: signed.
Procedural history
11 actions- May 14, 2025HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- May 14, 2025HouseOn agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 216 - 203 (Roll no. 127). (text: CR H2014-2015)
- May 14, 2025HouseFloorPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 216 - 203 (Roll no. 127). (text: CR H2014-2015)
- May 14, 2025HouseOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 204 (Roll no. 126).
- May 14, 2025HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2022-2023)
- May 14, 2025HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 405, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Leger Fernandez demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Show 5 earlier actions
- May 14, 2025HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 405.
- May 14, 2025HouseConsidered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2014-2021)
- May 13, 2025HousePlaced on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 27.
- May 13, 2025HouseThe resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243, and H.R. 2255. All bills are being considered under a closed rule with each bill having one motion to recommit.
- May 13, 2025HouseThe House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-95, by Mr. Roy.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
419
- Yes
- 216
- No
- 203
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (419)
395 more members
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
