POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas HB 39 directs surplus state revenue to lower school district property taxes

Original title: Relating to reducing school district maintenance and operations ad valorem taxes through the use of certain surplus state revenue.

Last action · July 14, 2025: FiledSponsors: Steve Toth and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Texas HB 39 requires the comptroller to allocate 90 percent of certain surplus general revenue to the property tax relief fund for reducing the used in school district property tax calculations. The measure applies beginning with the state fiscal biennium starting September 1, 2027.

Why it matters

Property owners in school districts experience lower local maintenance and operations tax burdens when surplus state revenue is redirected to fund school district operations.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Property taxpayers

School district maintenance and operations ad valorem tax rates are reduced through the application of surplus state revenue.

Directly affected

School districts

District tax rates and funding calculations are modified based on adjustments to the state compression percentage and potential elimination of tier one maintenance and operations taxes.

Directly affected

Comptroller of Public Accounts

The comptroller must calculate, allocate, and periodically deposit general revenue surpluses into the property tax relief fund.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does the money for property tax relief come from under HB 39?
The funds come from general revenue in an amount equal to 90 percent of the surplus by which general revenue received in a biennium exceeds appropriations under the state growth limit.
What happens if the state compression percentage reaches zero?
School districts may not impose a for that school year or any subsequent school year, and districts are entitled to funding as if they had a maximum compressed tax rate and no local share.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jul 14, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Mandatory Tax Rate Compression via Surplus Revenue

The bill links state general revenue surpluses directly to mandatory reductions in school district property tax compression percentages.

Connected Entities

Tom Oliverson, Steve Toth, Texas Education Agency and 2 more
PersonTom Oliverson“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonSteve Toth“Bill author and sponsor in the Texas House”Map →
OrganizationTexas Education Agency“Recipient of appropriated funds for property tax relief”Map →
PersonLeo Wilson“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
OrganizationComptroller of Public Accounts“Responsible for allocating general revenue surplus to the property tax relief fu”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 80)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record