POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proposed Coast Guard Shore-to-Ship Communication Network

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6185

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Senator Booker has proposed an amendment to the 2027 defense authorization bill that would require the Coast Guard to establish a nationwide shore-to-ship maritime communication network. The network would be operated through a private and would broadcast safety, security, and environmental information to vessels equipped with Automatic Identification Systems.

Why it matters

This amendment would create a new federal mandate for the Coast Guard to contract with private entities to manage maritime messaging, potentially changing how safety and navigation data is delivered to vessels across all U.S. coastlines.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Coast Guard

The agency is mandated to procure a services contract and establish new messaging procedures.

Directly affected

Vessel operators

Vessels equipped with Automatic Identification Systems would receive direct safety and security messaging from the new network.

Directly affected

Private/non-Federal station operators

Existing operators may be integrated into the new network through the Coast Guard's services contract.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of the proposed maritime communication network?
The network is designed to support navigation and provide critical safety, security, environmental, and waterways management information directly to vessels equipped with Automatic Identification Systems.
Will this replace existing private maritime communication stations?
No. The amendment directs the Coast Guard to leverage existing non-Federal stations and avoid duplicating coverage, provided those stations meet the network's technical requirements.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Public-Private Infrastructure Integration

The amendment explicitly mandates the integration of existing private infrastructure into a federal network to prevent duplication, signaling a preference for leveraging current assets over building new ones.

Connected Entities

Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Coast Guard and 2 more
OrganizationDepartment of Defense“The department whose fiscal year 2027 appropriations are addressed in the underl”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Energy“The department whose defense activities are addressed in the underlying bill.”Map →
OrganizationCoast Guard“The agency responsible for procuring the contract and managing the network.”Map →
PersonCory Booker“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →
OrganizationFederal Communications Commission“Agency that issues permits for existing shore-to-ship stations.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record