POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

New Mexico Senate Bill 229 Authorizes Physicians to Perform Auricular Acupuncture

Original title: ALLOW AURICULAR ACUPUNCTURE

Last action · February 3, 2026: Sent to SCC - Referrals: SCC/SHPAC/SJCSponsors: Candy Ezzell and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

ALLOW AURICULAR ACUPUNCTURE

Why it matters

Expands the pool of professionals permitted to perform specific ear-acupuncture procedures in medical settings, and adjusts administrative fees and rules for addiction-treatment specialists.

Background
  • Senate Bill 229 was introduced during the 2026 Regular Session of the New Mexico legislature. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Physicians

Licensed physicians gain authorization to perform auricular acupuncture within the scope of their medical license.

Directly affected

Certified Auricular Detoxification Specialists

Specialists remain subject to supervision, renewal timelines, and specific application fee caps.

Directly affected

Doctors of Oriental Medicine

Doctors of oriental medicine continue to serve as required supervisors for certified auricular detoxification specialists.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is newly authorized to perform auricular acupuncture under this bill?
Physicians licensed pursuant to the Medical Practice Act are authorized to perform within the scope of their medical license.
What fees are established for auricular detoxification specialists?
The board imposes an application fee not to exceed $150 for certification, a renewal fee not to exceed $75.00, and a late fee not to exceed $50.00.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Feb 3, 2026SenateCommittee
    Sent to SCC - Referrals: SCC/SHPAC/SJC

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Rex Wilson, State of New Mexico, Nicole Tobiassen and 1 more
PersonRex Wilson“Cosponsor of SB 229”Map →
OrganizationState of New Mexico“Legislative jurisdiction”Map →
PersonNicole Tobiassen“Introduced Senate Bill 229”Map →
PersonCandy Ezzell“Primary sponsor of SB 229”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.nmlegis.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record