The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Alabama Senate Bill 161 Expands Post-Conviction DNA Testing to Noncapital Inmates and Removes Time Limits
Last action · January 14, 2026: Pending Committee Action in House of OriginSponsor: Rob Stewart
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
Senate Bill 161 allows individuals convicted of s who are serving a term of imprisonment to request post-conviction DNA testing and eliminates existing time limitations for filing such motions. The measure takes effect on October 1, 2026.
Inmates convicted of non-death-penalty offenses gain a legal mechanism to petition circuit courts for forensic DNA testing to demonstrate factual innocence, altering post-conviction review timelines for state correctional populations.
- Under prior Alabama law enacted via Act 2009-768, post-conviction DNA testing was restricted to individuals convicted of capital offenses who met specific filing deadlines. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Inmates convicted of noncapital offenses
Inmates serving prison terms for noncapital convictions gain the legal right to request post-conviction forensic DNA testing without time limitations.
Circuit courts
Circuit courts must review new post-conviction DNA testing motions from noncapital inmates, determine testing conditions, and handle appointment of counsel for indigent petitioners.
Department of Forensic Sciences
The department is tasked with conducting DNA testing ordered under the section or having its testing costs covered by specific state funds for indigent applicants.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is eligible to request post-conviction DNA testing under this bill?
Are there still time limits for filing a motion for DNA testing?
Who pays for the DNA testing if the petitioner is indigent?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
2 actions- Jan 14, 2026SenateCommitteePending Committee Action in House of Origin
- Jan 14, 2026SenateIntroducedRead for the first time and referred to the Senate Committee on Judiciary
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Removal of Post-Conviction Time Bars
The legislation removes the historical restriction tying post-conviction DNA testing requests to Rule 32.2(c) or the 12-month window following Act 2009-768.
Connected Entities
Sources
alison.legislature.state.al.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools