Planning & Zoning Regular Meeting Agenda — Packet

CITY OF ANNA MARIA PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING July 15, 2026 9:00 A.M. P.O. Box 779, 10005 Gulf Drive, Anna Maria, FL 34216 Phone (941) 708-6130 THIS BOARD MEETING IS BEING HELD USING OPTIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY. Dial in using a telephone You may access the meeting from your phone by dialing 1 929 205 6099. When the Meeting ID is requested, enter 853 9200 0280 *OUT OF COURTESY TO OTHERS, PLEASE MUTE YOUR PHONE WHEN NOT SPEAKING* IF YOU WISH TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT, PRESS *9 ON YOUR PHONE Pledge of Conduct: We may disagree, but we will be respectful of one another. We will direct all comments to the issues. We will avoid personal attacks. 1. CALL TO ORDER Call to order, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance and roll call. 2. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are considered routine in nature and should be considered in a single motion. Items which warrant individual discussion should be removed from this list prior to the motion to adopt. Such items will be discussed separately. a. Approval of Meeting Minutes: April 15, 2026 3. ACTION ITEMS a. Interpretation Appeal- Section 90-2 (b)(2) a. A request to appeal staff’s interpretation of Section 90-2(b)(2) a. b. Variance Request- 204 Oak A request for a variance from City of Anna Maria Code of Ordinances Section 114-423(c)(4) allows a 6ft tall fence exceeding the 4ft maximum height within the street yard setback at 204 Oak Avenue. Continued. c. Variance Request- 308 Hardin A request for a variance from City of Anna Maria Code of Ordinances Sections 114-222(3)b, 114-222(4), and 114-222(5) to construct a pool exceeding permitted lot coverage by 2%, encroaching 10ft 1in into a 20ft front setback, encroaching 5ft into a 10ft side setback, as well as constructing a pool equipment pad encroaching 3ft 6in into a 10ft side setback located at 308 Hardin Avenue. Continued. d. Variance Request- 314 Hardin A request for a variance from City of Anna Maria Code of Ordinances Sections 114-222(3)b, 114-222(4), and 114-222(5) to construct two (2) pools exceeding the permitted number of pools, exceeding the permitted lot coverage by 5%, encroaching 15ft into a 20ft front setback, encroaching 5ft into a 10ft side setback, and constructing two (2) pool equipment pads encroaching 3ft into a 10ft western side setback and encroaching 5in into the eastern side setback located at 314 Hardin Avenue. Continued. 4. STAFF COMMENTS

5. CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS 6. B OARD MEMBER COMMENTS 7. PRESS COMMENTS 8. NEXT MEETING a. August 19, 2026, at 9:00 A.M. 9. ADJOURNMENT (FSS 286.26) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND FLORIDA STATE STATUTES, PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES NEEDING SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY CLERK FOR ASSISTANCE AT LEAST THREE BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING (941) 708-6130. SHOULD ANY INTERESTED PARTY SEEK TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, THEY WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS BE MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.

DRAFT Planning and Zoning April 15, 2026 9:00 a.m. E LECTED O FFICIALS PRESENT : Chair Jeff Rodencal Board Member Christine Aaron Board Member David Johnson Board Member Don Buswell-Charkow CITY S TAFF PRESENT : City Planner Ashley Austin City Attorney Becky Vose Deputy City Clerk Barbara Jeffries Code Manager Thomas Collins Sergeant Brett Getman Manatee County Sheriff’s Office Chair Rodencal called the meeting to order at 9:09 am followed by the Pledge of Allegiance and roll call. 1. CALL TO O RDER None. 2. CONSENT A GENDA The following items are considered routine in nature and should be considered in a single motion. Items which warrant individual discussion should be removed from this list prior to the motion to adopt. Such items will be discussed separately. a. Approval of Meeting Minutes: February 20, 2026 Motion: Board Member Aaron moved, Board Member Buswell-Charkow seconded and the motion carried 4-0 to approve the April 15, 2026, Consent Agenda. 3. S IGHT VISIBILITY S TUDY The Board continued discussion regarding the site visibility study and previous recommendations involving pedestrian safety, traffic visibility, law enforcement input, code enforcement considerations, and engineering recommendations. Chair Rodencal noted that the goal of the discussion was to work toward a consensus recommendation among the Board, consultants, and involved parties. He acknowledged

that final decisions regarding implementation would remain with the City, but emphasized the importance of providing coordinated citizen feedback and recommendations. Discussion focused on potential installation of flashing pedestrian beacons and related traffic safety measures. City Engineer, Mark Gillette, reviewed guidance regarding pedestrian crossing warrants and explained that flashing beacons are subject to specific requirements, including traffic volumes, pedestrian crossing counts, roadway characteristics, accident history, and other factors. He noted that the available data indicated that flashing beacons may be difficult to justify under current standards, particularly due to the roadway configuration and lower traffic volumes compared to locations where such devices are typically warranted. The Board discussed differences between Gulf Drive areas under state roadway jurisdiction and City-owned roadways. Mark explained that certain pedestrian crossing signage used on state roads may not automatically apply to City streets. The Board discussed whether the City could adopt an ordinance to establish additional pedestrian safety regulations. Legal counsel advised that, unless a matter is preempted by state law, the City may adopt local regulations to address safety concerns. Further review will be conducted regarding potential ordinance options and enforceability. Additional discussion occurred regarding pedestrian crossing volumes, peak periods, and whether crossing data should be evaluated during the busiest times of day rather than relying solely on average daily figures. The Board continued to review possible recommendations and agreed that additional information and evaluation may be needed before finalizing a recommendation. Pedestrian Crossings / Flashing Beacons Mark Gillette clarified that traffic studies typically evaluate peak-hour conditions, including both vehicle and pedestrian volumes. The Board discussed the significant seasonal fluctuations in pedestrian activity within the City and acknowledged that peak periods may provide a more accurate representation of safety concerns. The Board discussed the feasibility of installing flashing pedestrian beacons, including Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) and pedestrian hybrid beacons. The City Engineer explained that these devices require specific warrants, including pedestrian volumes, roadway characteristics, traffic conditions, and crash history. Due to the City’s roadway configuration and existing conditions, obtaining approval for flashing beacons may be challenging. The Board discussed alternative safety improvements, including high-visibility ladder- style crosswalk markings. Mark noted that enhanced crosswalk markings can improve

visibility and pedestrian awareness and may provide a practical alternative where flashing devices are not warranted. Recommendation: Remove flashing pedestrian beacons from the recommendations and replace with high-visibility ladder-style crosswalk markings where appropriate. Gulf Drive / Pedestrian Safety Discussion The Board discussed pedestrian crossing concerns near Gulf Drive and other high pedestrian areas. It was noted that crosswalks establish a legal pedestrian crossing area where motorists are required to yield, providing an additional safety measure. The Board agreed that lower-cost improvements should be considered where appropriate before pursuing more extensive traffic control devices. Stop Sign and Traffic Control Discussion – Jacaranda / North Bay Area The Board continued discussion regarding traffic concerns at North Bay Boulevard and Jacaranda Road. Discussion included: • Potential installation of additional stop signs. • Use of speed tables as a traffic-calming measure. • Concerns regarding increasing traffic, golf cart usage, pedestrian activity, and future growth. • The need to balance public safety with maintaining traffic flow. Code Enforcement Manager Thomas Collins provided input based on his experience as a former crash investigator and expressed concerns regarding vehicle speeds, golf cart traffic, and near misses observed at the intersection. He recommended additional traffic controls, including stop signs and speed-calming measures, to address safety concerns. Board members discussed whether additional stop signs should be addressed as part of the current visibility study or through a separate citywide traffic control evaluation. The Board agreed that the current study should remain focused primarily on visibility triangles. Additional stop sign evaluations and traffic control measures should be addressed separately by the City through a broader traffic study or review. Visibility Triangle Study Scope The Board discussed the original purpose of the study and agreed that the primary focus should remain on identifying and correcting visibility obstructions, including: • Vegetation within visibility triangles.

• Fences or other obstructions affecting sight distance. • Conditions affect safe movement through intersections. The Board noted that recommendations such as adjusting stop bars, relocating existing signage, and adding warning signs may remain in the final recommendations when they correct existing conditions rather than introduce new traffic patterns. The Board acknowledged the collaborative efforts of the City Engineer, City Planner, and involved staff in preparing the study. North Bay Boulevard / Jacaranda Road • Retain recommendation for stop bars and pavement markings. • Remove consideration of additional stop signs from the Site Visibility Study recommendations. • Additional traffic control review may be considered separately by the City. North Shore Drive / Fern Avenue • Remove flashing pedestrian beacon recommendation. • Replace with high-visibility pedestrian crossing markings where appropriate. North Shore Drive / Palm Avenue The Board reviewed the recommendation for North Shore Drive and Palm Avenue. The Board noted that this intersection is the only location within the study where documented accident history was identified. The recommendation to create a four-way stop at the intersection was discussed. The Board also discussed the existing speed humps near the intersection and whether they should remain if a four-way stop is installed. After discussion, the Board determined that the speed humps provide an additional traffic- calming measure and recommended retaining them. The Board agreed that the four-way stop recommendation should remain. South Bay Boulevard / Kumquat Drive The Board reviewed this intersection and discussed visibility concerns related to vegetation and fencing. The Board clarified that the primary visibility concern was vegetation within the visibility triangle rather than the existing picket fence. The recommendation was revised to include removal or trimming of vegetation within the visibility triangle to maintain required sight distance.

The Board noted that one previously identified fence did not have a permit; however, redevelopment of the property may resolve the issue. Other Visibility Triangle Locations The Board continued reviewing additional intersections and generally agreed with the recommendations provided, including: • Removal or trimming of vegetation obstructing sight distance. • Reduction or removal of fence obstructions where applicable. • Maintaining visibility triangles in accordance with City requirements. North Shore Drive / Cypress Avenue The Board reviewed recommendations regarding visibility of the existing speed hump. Due to the roadway curve and limited visibility, the Board discussed additional warning measures. Mark Gillette recommended enhanced pavement markings, such as advance speed hump markings, as a low-cost option to alert drivers before reaching the speed hump. The Board supported considering both advance warning signage and pavement markings. North Shore Drive / Coconut Avenue The Board reviewed the intersection and noted that prior code enforcement action had already addressed vegetation concerns at this location. Additional trimming may be required as vegetation grows. Pine Avenue / North Shore Drive The Board discussed this intersection and agreed that vegetation removal and visibility improvements should continue. The Board also discussed pedestrian safety concerns and agreed that a four-way stop and enhanced pedestrian markings should remain part of the recommendation. The Board discussed newer pedestrian safety technology, including in-roadway flashing pedestrian devices observed in other communities. The Board noted these options may be considered in the future as additional pedestrian safety measures. Pine Avenue / Crescent Drive The Board discussed realigning an existing crosswalk due to the location of the sidewalk connection and pedestrian movement patterns. The Board noted the high volume of pedestrian traffic in the area and supported evaluating crosswalk alignment improvements.

Pine Avenue The Board discussed parking within visibility triangles near Pine Avenue businesses. Staff reported that recent no-parking signage had been installed in certain areas and that additional review was underway regarding parking restrictions near Beach Bums to maintain visibility. Gulf Drive Intersections The Board reviewed remaining Golf Drive intersections and discussed pedestrian safety concerns, particularly during periods of increased tourism activity. The Board discussed adding high-visibility pedestrian crossings at major intersections connecting Gulf access and Bay access points. The Board noted increased pedestrian, bicycle, and golf cart traffic during peak periods and supported considering additional pedestrian markings where appropriate. The Board also discussed existing multi-use pathways and bicycle routing concerns. The Board agreed with the recommendation to remove confusing pavement markings that direct bicycles onto the multi-use path in a manner that may create conflicting travel patterns. Final Site Visibility Study Recommendations The Board agreed that the consultant would incorporate the discussed edits and prepare a final version of the Site Visibility Study for review. The Board agreed that the final document would then be forwarded to the City for consideration and implementation planning. Water Pressure Discussion Chair Rodencal provided an update regarding discussions with the Mayor concerning water pressure concerns. The City is not currently undertaking a specific water pressure study. The Board discussed potentially revisiting the topic after completion of the planned water main improvements, which may impact system pressure. The Board agreed to consider placing water pressure as a future agenda item. Pedestrian Traffic Study Chair Rodencal provided an update regarding a potential pedestrian traffic study. The City is currently working through an existing Pine Avenue corridor plan, including required approvals.

The Board discussed potentially evaluating pedestrian traffic conditions in other areas of the City and agreed to place discussion of a potential pedestrian traffic study on a future agenda. 4. S TAFF COMMENTS None. 5. CITY ATTORNEY C OMMENTS None. 6. B OARD MEMBER COMMENTS None. 7. PRESS COMMENTS None. 8. NEXT MEETING The Board discussed scheduling conflicts for the next meeting. Due to scheduling conflicts and previously noticed agenda items, the Board agreed to move the next meeting to: May 27, 2026 The Board will revisit whether a June meeting is necessary at that time. 9. ADJOURNMENT Chair Rodencal adjourned the meeting at 10:43 a.m. Minutes Approved: ______________________________________ City Clerk, Amber LaRowe

Presenter/Department: City Planner Ashley Austin Title: Appeal to Staff’s Interpretation Regarding Driveway Access Points Staff Contact: City Planner Ashley Austin City of Anna Maria Agenda Meeting Date: 7/15/2026 Background Information: A permit application was received for a new single-family residence located at the northeast corner of Gulf Drive and Elm Avenue with driveway access points proposed off both intersecting streets. Upon review of the application, staff applied its interpretation of Section 90-2(b)(2)a in advising that access shall be provided by way of Elm Avenue and the proposed access point(s) off Gulf Drive must be removed. As such, the applicant has submitted a formal request to appeal staff’s interpretation of Section 90-2(b)(2)a: Corner parcels on Gulf Drive and Pine Avenue shall provide access by way of the intersecting local street. A copy of the formal request is attached as Exhibit A. Staff’s interpretation is supported by text amendments made to this Section in 2012 which: • removed the distinction between corner parcels based on lot frontage in regulating access points; • removed the ability for corner parcels on collector roads to provide a secondary access off the collector road; • replaced “collector” with “Gulf Drive and Pine Avenue”; and • regulated that all corner parcels on Gulf Drive and Pine Avenue shall provide access by way of the intersecting local street. Notice: Notice of this hearing has been provided as required by the City Code by mail, publication and posting of the subject property. Public Comment: No comments have been received. Exhibits: Exhibit A: Formal Request to Appeal Exhibit B: Current City of Anna Maria Code of Ordinances Section 90-2 Exhibit C: Ordinance No. 12-745 Amendments Exhibit D: Proposed Compliant Access Points Exhibit E: Proposed Noncompliant Access Points

Exhibit A: Formal Request to Appeal

Exhibit B: Current City of Anna Maria Code of Ordinances Section 90-2

Exhibit C: Ordinance No. 12-745 Amendments

Exhibit D: Proposed Compliant Access Points

Exhibit E: Proposed Noncompliant Access Points