POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Idaho Senate Bill 1394 establishes strict conditions, mandatory review timelines, and background checks for supervised child visitation

Original title: CHILD CUSTODY – Amends existing law to establish provisions regarding supervised visitation.

Last action · March 17, 2026: Reported Printed; referred to Judiciary & Rules

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Idaho Senate Bill 1394 requires courts to state specific reasons for ordering and mandates that orders be reviewed within 49 calendar days. The measure prohibits using supervised visits as punishment and requires paid providers to undergo comprehensive fingerprint-based background checks starting July 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Parents involved in custody disputes face new statutory requirements for visitation orders, including mandatory 49-day and 90-day review intervals and clear criteria for transitioning to unsupervised parenting time.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Parents in custody disputes

Must participate in mandatory 49-day and 90-day court reviews of visitation orders and benefit from statutory protections against punitive supervision.

Directly affected

Paid supervised access providers

Must pay for and submit to comprehensive fingerprint-based criminal history and registry checks before providing services.

Directly affected

Supreme Court of Idaho

Must adopt rules specifying provider qualifications and duties and maintain records of all background checks.

Key Facts

  • Courts ordering supervised visitation must state the reasons for the order in their decision and review the order within 49 calendar days.
  • Supervised visitation cannot be ordered or continued absent good cause shown by clear and convincing evidence.
  • All supervised visitation orders must include clear, objective conditions for transitioning to unsupervised parenting time and periodic reviews at intervals not exceeding 90 days.
  • Preference for supervised access providers must be given to unpaid providers agreed upon by the parties.
Show all 10 facts
  • Paid supervised access providers must submit to a fingerprint-based criminal history check at their own cost prior to acting in that capacity.
  • Criminal checks must include a statewide criminal identification bureau check, FBI criminal history check, child abuse registry check, adult protection registry check, and statewide sex offender registry check.
  • Records of all background checks for paid supervised access providers must be maintained in the office of the Idaho Supreme Court.
  • A parent's legitimate inability to attend supervised visitation is not deemed a voluntary relinquishment of time.
  • Supervised visitation is explicitly prohibited from being used as a punitive measure, leverage, or a substitute for proof of unfitness.
  • The provisions apply only to custody and parenting time determinations between parents and do not modify, limit, or supersede Chapter 16, Title 16, Idaho Code.

Frequently Asked Questions

How quickly must a court review a supervised visitation order?
The initial order must be reviewed within 49 calendar days, and subsequent periodic reviews must occur at intervals not to exceed 90 days.
Are supervised access providers required to undergo background checks?
Yes. Paid s must submit to a fingerprint-based criminal history check at their own cost before acting in that capacity.
Can supervised visitation be used as punishment in custody disputes?
No. The bill explicitly states that shall not be used as a punitive measure, leverage, or a substitute for proof of unfitness.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Mar 17, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed; referred to Judiciary & Rules
  2. Mar 16, 2026Introduced
    Introduced; read first time; referred to JR for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Mandatory Judicial Review Timelines

The legislation establishes strict statutory review deadlines (49 days initially, then 90 days) for all supervised visitation orders, addressing prior gaps in oversight.

Connected Entities

JUDICIARY AND RULES COMMITTEE, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Supreme Court
OrganizationJUDICIARY AND RULES COMMITTEE“Senate committee sponsoring Senate Bill 1394”Map →
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation“Conducts criminal history checks for paid supervised access providers”Map →
OrganizationSupreme Court“Responsible for adopting rules specifying qualifications and duties of supervise”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record