POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofTaxes →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut bill proposes eliminating the 1% additional sales and use tax on restaurant and grocery meals

Original title: AN ACT CONCERNING THE SALES AND USE TAXES IMPOSED ON MEALS SOLD BY AN EATING ESTABLISHMENT, CATERER OR GROCERY STORE.

Last action · February 10, 2026: Referred to Joint Committee on Finance, Revenue and BondingSponsors: Patrick Biggins and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Proposed Bill 5130 eliminates the additional one per cent currently imposed on meals sold by eating establishments, caterers, and grocery stores under chapter 219 of the general statutes.

Why it matters

Residents purchasing prepared meals from restaurants, caterers, or grocery stores would no longer pay the extra one per cent tax rate.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers purchasing meals from restaurants, caterers, and grocery stores would no longer pay the additional one per cent tax.

Directly affected

Eating establishments, caterers, and grocery stores

Businesses selling meals would no longer collect the additional one per cent sales and use tax.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which businesses are affected by this bill?
Eating establishments, caterers, and grocery stores that sell meals are affected.
What specific tax is being removed?
The bill eliminates the additional one per cent es imposed on meals.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Feb 10, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Finance, Revenue and Bonding

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Joint Committee on Finance, Revenue and Bonding, General Assembly, Patrick Biggins and 1 more
OrganizationJoint Committee on Finance, Revenue and Bonding“Committee to which the bill was referred”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Connecticut legislative body”Map →
PersonPatrick Biggins“Representative for the 11th District introducing Proposed Bill No. 5130”Map →
PersonBob Godfrey“Representative for the 110th District introducing Proposed Bill No. 5130”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record