The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas establishes early childhood mental health home visiting grant program for high-risk families
Last action · May 21, 2025: Referred to Health & Human ServicesSponsors: Senfronia Thompson and 2 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Texas establishes a grant program requiring the state health to fund home visiting services for high-need families with histories of trauma, effective September 1, 2025.
Qualifying organizations that provide home-based mental health support to low-income families with young children become eligible to apply for state-administered grant funding.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
families with a high level of need, including a history of trauma
Families receive home-based support services from a licensed mental health professional and a care coordinator to improve mental health, school readiness, and family well-being.
grant applicants providing early childhood mental health or prevention services
Eligible organizations may apply for state grants to implement, expand, or maintain early childhood mental health home visiting services subject to commission contracts and standards.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is eligible to receive a grant under this program?
What personnel must grant recipients use to provide home-based services?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
27 actions- May 21, 2025SenateCommitteeReferred to Health & Human Services
- May 21, 2025SenateIntroducedRead first time
- May 19, 2025SenateReceived from the House
- May 16, 2025HouseReported engrossed
- May 16, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- May 16, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#2829)
Show 21 earlier actions
- May 16, 2025HouseFloorPassed
- May 16, 2025HouseFloorRead 3rd time
- May 15, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- May 15, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#2708)
- May 15, 2025HouseFloorPassed to engrossment
- May 15, 2025HouseFloorRead 2nd time
- May 12, 2025HousePlaced on General State Calendar
- May 10, 2025HouseConsidered in Calendars
- May 9, 2025HouseCommittee report sent to Calendars
- May 8, 2025HouseCommittee report distributed
- May 8, 2025HouseComte report filed with Committee Coordinator
- May 1, 2025HouseCommitteeReported favorably w/o amendment(s)
- May 1, 2025HouseConsidered in formal meeting
- May 1, 2025HouseRecalled from subcommittee
- Apr 17, 2025HouseLeft pending in subcommittee
- Apr 17, 2025HouseTestimony taken/registration(s) recorded in subcommittee
- Apr 17, 2025HouseConsidered by s/c in public hearing
- Apr 17, 2025HouseScheduled for public hearing in s/c on . . .
- Mar 14, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to s/c on Dis Prev & Women's & Children's Health by Speaker
- Mar 14, 2025HouseIntroducedRead first time
- Jan 17, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
HB 1955 was passed
Total
140
- Yes
- 71
- No
- 55
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 1
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 13
How they voted (140)
116 more members
Show 1 earlier roll call
HB 1955 was passed to engrossment
Total
132
- Yes
- 78
- No
- 47
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 1
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 6
How they voted (132)
108 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
