CHICAGO (COOK COUNTY)lobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: Hot Pepper Entertainment (2014)

Original title: LANGDON D NEAL for HOT PEPPER ENTERTAINMENT @ COMMITTEES OF THE CITY COUNCIL (2014-01-01)

January 1, 2014

lobbying real estate development city council

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This document discloses that a private entity sought to influence Chicago City Council committees regarding a specific development project between January and March 2014.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Hot Pepper Entertainment

The entity is seeking specific development outcomes from the City Council.

Chicago City Council Committees

The committees are the targets of the lobbying effort regarding a development project.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2014.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

Lobbyist Langdon D. Neal represented Hot Pepper Entertainment to influence administrative and legislative actions regarding a project in Chicago during the first quarter of 2014.

Key Facts

Lobbyist Langdon D. Neal represented Hot Pepper Entertainment.
The lobbying activity targeted Committees of the City Council in Chicago, IL.
The lobbying sought to influence both administrative and legislative actions.
The specific goal of the lobbying was a 'Planned Development' project.
The reporting period for this activity was January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2014.

Why It Matters

This document discloses that a private entity sought to influence Chicago City Council committees regarding a specific development project between January and March 2014.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a 'Planned Development' in this context?

The document identifies it as the specific project or zoning action that the lobbyist was seeking to influence through City Council committees.

What does it mean that the lobbyist sought 'both administrative and legislative' action?

It indicates the lobbyist was attempting to influence both the day-to-day operations or permit processes (administrative) and the formal law-making or approval processes (legislative) of the City Council.