The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Mississippi proposes $2 million for City of Columbia Sports Complex improvements
Last action · February 25, 2026: 02/25 (S) Died In CommitteeSponsor: Joey Fillingane
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Senate Bill 3127 proposes a $2,000,000 from the State General Fund to the City of Columbia for sports complex renovations, taking effect July 1, 2026.
The measure allocates state funds specifically for local recreational infrastructure improvements in Columbia, Mississippi.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
City of Columbia
Receives $2,000,000 in state funds to expand and renovate the municipal sports complex.
State Treasurer
Responsible for paying out the appropriated money from the State General Fund upon warrants.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much money does Senate Bill 3127 allocate?
What is the intended use of the funds?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died in committee.
Procedural history
2 actions- Feb 25, 2026Senate02/25 (S) Died In Committee
- Feb 18, 2026SenateCommittee02/18 (S) Referred To Appropriations
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools