The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.North Dakota puts single-subject rule for constitutional amendments on the June 2026 primary ballot
Last action · April 29, 2025: Filed with Secretary Of State 04/29Sponsors: David Hogue and 5 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
North Dakota voters will decide in June 2026 whether to require all legislative constitutional amendments and citizen s to address only a single subject. The measure tasks the secretary of state with determining whether initiative petitions comply before approving them for circulation.
Changes the legal standards for placing constitutional changes on the ballot by restricting initiatives and legislative proposals to one topic per measure, affecting how future policy proposals are structured.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
qualified electors of North Dakota
Voters will decide the constitutional amendment at the June 2026 primary election and will vote on future single-subject ballot measures.
legislative assembly
Lawmakers must ensure any proposed constitutional amendments they adopt are limited to a single subject.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the single-subject rule apply to?
Who decides if an initiative petition complies with the single-subject rule?
When will voters decide on this constitutional change?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
23 actions- Apr 29, 2025SenateFiled with Secretary Of State 04/29
- Apr 29, 2025SenateSigned by President
- Apr 28, 2025HouseSigned by Speaker
- Apr 24, 2025HouseFloorSecond reading, adopted yeas 57 nays 36
- Apr 24, 2025HouseCommitteeConference committee report adopted
- Apr 21, 2025HouseCommitteeReported back from conference committee, placed on calendar (House reject)
Show 17 earlier actions
- Apr 21, 2025SenateCommitteeConference committee report adopted
- Apr 17, 2025SenateCommitteeReported back from conference committee, placed on calendar (House reject)
- Apr 16, 2025HouseAppoint Rep. Bahl to replace Rep. T. Brown on conference committee
- Apr 15, 2025HouseCommitteeConference committee appointed Rohr Steiner T. Brown
- Apr 11, 2025SenateCommitteeConference committee appointed Roers Lee Braunberger
- Apr 11, 2025SenateRefused to concur
- Mar 19, 2025SenateReturned to Senate (12)
- Mar 18, 2025HouseFloorSecond reading, adopted as amended yeas 68 nays 25
- Mar 17, 2025HouseCommitteeAmendment adopted, placed on calendar
- Mar 14, 2025HouseCommitteeReported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 8 6 0
- Mar 14, 2025HouseCommitteeCommittee Hearing 08:30
- Mar 7, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduced, first reading, referred Government and Veterans Affairs Committee
- Feb 25, 2025HouseReceived from Senate
- Feb 24, 2025SenateFloorSecond reading, adopted yeas 46 nays 1
- Feb 21, 2025SenateCommitteeReported back, do pass, place on calendar 5 1 0
- Feb 20, 2025SenateCommitteeCommittee Hearing 09:00
- Jan 27, 2025SenateIntroducedIntroduced, first reading, referred State and Local Government Committee
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Connected Entities
Sources
ndlegis.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
