POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut bill mandates identification and reporting for nonresident residential property owners starting October 2026

Original title: AN ACT REQUIRING THE COLLECTION OF IDENTIFYING INFORMATION OF NONRESIDENT OWNERS OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.

Last action · April 7, 2026: Tabled for the Calendar, HouseSponsors: Gary Winfield and 8 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Beginning October 1, 2026, municipalities with a population of 25,000 or more must require nonresident owners and s to report current residential addresses and specific identifying information to designated municipal officers. Nonresident owners and agents must update address changes within 21 days, and failure to comply results in fines ranging from $250 to $1,000.

Background
  • The General Assembly introduces and reviews substitute bills concerning housing and municipal regulations during its legislative sessions. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Nonresident owners

Nonresident owners must submit residential addresses and identifying information to municipal tax assessors and face fines between $250 and $1,000 for noncompliance.

Directly affected

Project-based housing providers

Project-based housing providers are subject to mandatory reporting of residential addresses and identifying information to local municipal officers.

Directly affected

Municipal tax assessors

Municipal tax assessors or designated officers are responsible for receiving and maintaining confidential reports of nonresident owner contact and identifying details.

Key Facts

  • Municipalities with a population of 25,000 or more must require nonresident owners and project-based housing providers to report current residential addresses and identifying information to the tax assessor or designated municipal officer.
  • If a nonresident owner or project-based housing provider is a corporation, partnership, trust, or other legally recognized entity, the report must include identifying information and residential addresses for each controlling participant.
  • Address changes must be reported to the designated municipal office within 21 days of the change occurring.
  • Failure to file an address causes the municipality to deem the address used for mailing property tax bills as the current address for service purposes.
Show all 7 facts
  • Violations of this section constitute a violation punishable by a fine of not less than $250 nor more than $1,000.
  • Reports provided to tax assessors or municipal officers on or after October 1, 2023, are confidential and exempt from chapter 14 disclosure.
  • Landlords are statutorily required to comply with the reporting requirements established under section 47a-6a.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which municipalities are required to collect this identifying information?
Any municipality with a population of 25,000 or more must require the nonresident owner or to report identifying information and residential addresses.
What happens if a property owner fails to update their address?
If an owner or agent fails to file an address update, the address where the municipality mails property tax bills is legally deemed to be their current address.
Are the submitted reports available to the general public?
No, reports provided to tax assessors or designated municipal officers are confidential and exempt from disclosure under chapter 14.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Tabled in the House.

Procedural history

15 actions
  1. Apr 7, 2026House
    Tabled for the Calendar, House
  2. Apr 7, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    No New File by Committee on Planning and Development
  3. Apr 7, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  4. Apr 7, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Apr 6, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable
  6. Mar 31, 2026House
    Referred by House to Committee on Planning and Development
Show 9 earlier actions
  1. Mar 23, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 105
  2. Mar 23, 2026House
    House Calendar Number 99
  3. Mar 23, 2026House
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, House
  4. Mar 23, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Mar 16, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/23/26 12:00 PM
  6. Mar 6, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  7. Mar 5, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable Substitute
  8. Feb 13, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 02/17
  9. Feb 11, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Housing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Shift from Infraction to Fined Violations

The bill amends prior law by replacing an unspecified infraction designation with explicit monetary fines ranging from $250 to $1,000.

Connected Entities

Rep. Laurie Sweet, Sen. Martin M. Looney, Housing Committee and 8 more
PersonRep. Laurie Sweet“Cosponsor representing the 91st District”Map →
PersonSen. Martin M. Looney“Cosponsor representing the 11th District”Map →
OrganizationHousing Committee“Bill sponsor”Map →
PersonRep. Jane M. Garibay“Cosponsor representing the 60th District”Map →
PersonSen. Gary A. Winfield“Cosponsor representing the 10th District”Map →
PersonRep. Rebecca Martinez“Cosponsor representing the 22nd District”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Housing and Urban Development“Federal agency partnering with project-based housing providers”Map →
PersonRep. Nicholas Menapace“Cosponsor representing the 37th District”Map →
PersonRep. Antonio Felipe“Cosponsor representing the 130th District”Map →
PersonRep. Nick Gauthier“Cosponsor representing the 38th District”Map →
PersonSen. Herron Gaston“Cosponsor representing the 23rd District”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record