The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Vermont bill requires police to display identification and bans masks during public interactions
Last action · January 22, 2026: Read first time and referred to the Committee on JudiciarySponsors: Leonora Dodge and 42 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
Vermont House Bill 747 requires all local, state, and federal law enforcement officers to clearly display their agency and name or badge number while interacting with the public, and prohibits masks or personal disguises with specific exceptions beginning July 1, 2026.
Establishes criminal penalties of up to one year in prison or a $1,000 fine for officers who violate identification and mask rules, while creating civil liabilities including claims for unlawful arrests.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
local, state, and federal law enforcement officers
Law enforcement officers must visibly display their agency and name or badge number, comply with restrictions on masks during public interactions, and face criminal penalties and civil liability for violations.
law enforcement agencies
Agencies must develop, distribute to personnel, and publicly post a written policy detailing identification requirements and undercover exceptions.
members of the public
Residents gain the right to clearly identify officers during interactions and may bring civil legal actions for monetary, punitive, and equitable damages if arrested in violation of the statute.
Key Facts
- All local, state, and federal law enforcement officers must clearly display their agency and name or badge number on their uniform while interacting with the public.
- Law enforcement officers are prohibited from wearing any mask or personal disguise while interacting with the public in the performance of their duties.
- Exceptions to the mask ban include medical-grade surgical masks, N95 respirators, smoke protection masks, water rescue breathing apparatuses, biological or chemical agent protection, cold weather gear, motorcycle helmets, and laser-protective eyewear.
- Tactical Services Unit (TSU) team officers and officers participating in lawful active undercover drug-related operations are permitted to use necessary face protection or disguises.
Show all 10 facts
- Law enforcement agencies operating in the State must develop, distribute, and publicly post a written policy on the identification requirements.
- An officer who violates the identification or mask rules may be imprisoned for not more than one year, fined not more than $1,000.00, or both.
- An officer who violates the section and knowingly and willfully arrests someone may be civilly liable for false imprisonment.
- Individuals arrested in violation of these rules may bring civil actions for monetary damages, equitable relief, punitive damages, and attorney's fees.
- The Attorney General may bring civil actions on behalf of the State for injunctive, equitable, or declaratory relief.
- The act takes effect on July 1, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What information must law enforcement officers display while working?
Are there any exceptions where officers are allowed to wear masks?
What are the penalties for a law enforcement officer who violates these rules?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
1 action- Jan 22, 2026HouseIntroducedRead first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 38 more sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
legislature.vermont.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy85Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz60Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
