The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Withdrawal of Zoning Waiver Request for 4526 Mundy Drive South
Record date · April 28, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The City Council has officially withdrawn a proposed ordinance that would have allowed a property owner to waive the minimum requirement for a parcel located at 4526 Mundy Drive South. The request, which sought to reduce the requirement from 144 feet to 0 feet, will not proceed.
The property owner, Mundy Land Trust, will remain subject to existing zoning regulations requiring 144 feet of for the parcel, as the requested was formally withdrawn by the City Council.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Mundy Land Trust
The trust is the applicant for the zoning waiver that was withdrawn, meaning their request for a frontage reduction was not granted.
District 5 Residents
Residents in the district are affected by the maintenance of existing zoning standards for land use in their area.
Key Facts
- The ordinance (File 2026-0177-W) was formally withdrawn by the City Council on April 28, 2026, by a vote of 17-0.
- The Land Use and Zoning (LUZ) committee previously voted 6-0 to withdraw the request on April 22, 2026.
- The original proposal sought to reduce the minimum road frontage requirement for 4526 Mundy Dr S from 144 feet to 0 feet.
- The property is located in an RLD-90 zoning district.
Show all 6 facts
- The application was filed under reference number WRF-26-05.
- The ordinance was originally introduced to the City Council on March 10, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens to the property now that the waiver is withdrawn?
Why was the request withdrawn?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Withdrawn.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Unanimous Withdrawal
The request was withdrawn with total consensus from both the committee and the full council, suggesting the application may have been incomplete or non-compliant with standard zoning expectations.
Sources
webapi.legistar.com
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools