POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofEmergencies →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
AB 2150CALIFORNIASession 20252026State Billdead
Did Not Advance

California Bill AB 2150 requires employers mandating CPR training to include opioid reversal training for employees

Original title: Emergencies: personnel: training requirements: opioid overdose reversals.

Record date · September 3, 2026

Bill progressHistory & official text ↓
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

Emergencies: personnel: training requirements: opioid overdose reversals.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Employers operating in this state that require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification training

Employers must mandate and ensure employees complete an online video training module on the use of naloxone.

Directly affected

Employees

Covered employees must take an online video module training on the use of naloxone to increase opioid overdose reversals.

Directly affected

Emergency Medical Services Authority

The authority must review and approve the online video module trainings to ensure content meets minimum standards.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is required to take the online opioid reversal training under this bill?
Employees of any employer operating in the state that already requires certification training must take the online video module training on naloxone, with specified exceptions.
Which agency is responsible for approving the training module?
The Emergency Medical Services Authority is required to review and approve the online video module trainings to ensure they meet minimum standards.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Follow the record

Votes, people, money & the original source

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the Assembly.

Version history & redline

4 versions on file

Official version history is partial: 4 linked texts are unavailable or incomplete. Source links remain available below.

Comparing 03/19/26 - Amended Assembly → 05/18/26 - Amended Assembly
removed addedOfficial text

The text diff for this stage has not been computed yet.

pdf extract failed: Invalid PDF structure.

Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

California Health and Human Services Agency, United States Food and Drug Administration, Division of Occupational Safety and Health and 2 more
OrganizationCalifornia Health and Human Services Agency“Parent agency of the Emergency Medical Services Authority.”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Food and Drug Administration“Regulatory body for approving opioid antagonists.”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Occupational Safety and Health“Responsible for enforcing the new training requirements under OSHA.”Map →
OrganizationEmergency Medical Services Authority“Responsible for reviewing and approving online naloxone training modules.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Industrial Relations“Parent department of the Division of Occupational Safety and Health.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record