POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

New Jersey bill regulates out-of-network medical billing, requires cost disclosures, and creates dispute resolution panels

Original title: "Health Care Consumer's Out-of-Network Protection, Transparency, Cost Containment and Accountability Act."

Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance CommitteeSponsor: Auth, Robert

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Assembly Bill 504 requires health care providers and facilities to disclose their network status and estimated costs before non-emergency procedures, bans for emergency services, and establishes peer review panels to resolve billing disputes.

Why it matters

Patients facing unexpected medical bills can dispute charges exceeding $500 through newly established state peer review programs, while providers and insurers must update network disclosures and claims data transparency.

Background
  • Surprise out-of-network billing occurs when patients receive emergency or ancillary medical services from providers who do not participate in their health insurance plan's network, often resulting in unexpected out-of-pocket charges. context
  • Assemblyman Robert Auth represents New Jersey's 39th Legislative District in the General Assembly. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Health care consumers

Consumers receive mandatory disclosures regarding provider network status and cost estimates, gain protections against surprise emergency bills, and obtain access to a peer review process for billing disputes.

Directly affected

Physicians and non-participating physicians

Physicians must provide network disclosures, written cost estimates, and ancillary provider information, and are subject to peer review determinations on balance billing and medical necessity.

Directly affected

Health care facilities

Facilities must disclose network and pricing information prior to non-emergency procedures, provide written warnings regarding out-of-network ancillary staff, and participate in dispute resolution programs.

Directly affected

Carriers and third party administrators

Insurers and administrators must update online network directories within 20 days of changes, provide network lists to employers and providers, and issue written notices of consumer protections.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if I receive emergency care from an out-of-network doctor at a hospital?
For medically necessary emergency services, a non-participating facility-based physician cannot bill you for amounts above what would apply if you used a participating physician, other than standard deductible, copayment, or coinsurance amounts.
When can I request a peer review for a disputed medical bill?
You or your health plan can refer a billing dispute to a peer review panel if you did not agree to be treated by a non-participating provider in a non-emergency situation, or if a knowingly selected out-of-network service exceeds the provider's estimate by at least $500.
What information must physicians provide before scheduling a non-emergency procedure?
Physicians must disclose whether they are in your health plan's network, provide the names and contact details of any ancillary physicians (such as anesthesiologists or radiologists) whose services will be used, and secure your written consent if using out-of-network providers.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Auth, RobertPrimary sponsorNo profile match

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Establishment of Dual Peer Review Programs

The legislation creates two distinct peer review programs—one for physicians within the State Board of Medical Examiners and another for health care facilities overseen by the Department of Banking and Insurance—to resolve balance billing disputes independently of traditional arbitration.

Connected Entities

Robert Auth, Department of Banking and Insurance, State Board of Medical Examiners and 2 more
PersonRobert Auth“Assemblyman sponsoring Assembly Bill 504 representing District 39”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Banking and Insurance“State department responsible for overseeing insurance and receiving peer review ”Map →
OrganizationState Board of Medical Examiners“Houses the Physicians' Medical Bill Dispute Resolution Review Program”Map →
OrganizationMedical Society of New Jersey“Consulted by the Governor in appointing members to the Physicians' Medical Bill ”Map →
OrganizationNew Jersey Hospital Association“Consulted by the Governor in appointing members to the Health Care Facilities Me”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record