POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Securing Global Telecommunications Act (H.R. 4741)

Original title: Securing Global Telecommunications Act

Record date · September 10, 2024

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill requires the U.S. Secretary of State to create a strategy for promoting secure global telecommunications infrastructure and to report on foreign influence within international technology standards organizations. It aims to counter the market dominance of companies linked to the Chinese Communist Party and Russia by coordinating with international allies and U.S. agencies.

Why it matters

The bill mandates that the State Department develop a formal strategy within 90 days to influence global technology standards and infrastructure financing, which could shift how U.S. foreign aid and diplomatic resources are used to compete with Chinese and Russian telecommunications providers.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. telecommunications companies

The bill aims to support their competitiveness and market leadership in next-generation technologies.

Directly affected

Developing nations

The strategy focuses on bolstering multilateral cooperation with these countries to promote secure network deployment.

Directly affected

Federal agencies (State, Commerce, FCC, etc.)

These agencies are mandated to consult on and develop specific strategies and reports within a 90-day timeframe.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main goal of this bill?
To promote the use of secure telecommunications infrastructure worldwide and counter the influence of companies linked to the Chinese Communist Party and Russia.
What does 'rip-and-replace' mean in this context?
It refers to projects that remove existing, untrusted telecommunications equipment and replace it with trusted alternatives.
Does this bill apply to telecommunications within the United States?
No, the bill specifically focuses on promoting secure infrastructure in countries other than the United States.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

1607 STRATEGIES, LLC

on behalf of Stonington Global OBO Maxsip Tel LLC

2024

TELECOMMUNICATIONS

“H.R. 8466, Affordable Connectivity Program Improvement and Extension Act of 2024, all provisions. S. 4317, Secure and Affordable Broadband Extension Act, all provisions. Issues related to Supply Chain Reimbursement Program (aka Rip and Replace Program). Issues related to the Affordable Connectivity Program.”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

1607 STRATEGIES, LLC

on behalf of Stonington Global OBO Maxsip Tel LLC

2024

TELECOMMUNICATIONS

“H.R. 8466, Affordable Connectivity Program Improvement and Extension Act of 2024, all provisions. S. 4317, Secure and Affordable Broadband Extension Act, all provisions. Issues related to Supply Chain Reimbursement Program (aka Rip and Replace Program). Issues related to the Affordable Connectivity Program.”

Senate LDAMatched on title words onlyView filing on LDA.gov →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on ITU Governance

The bill marks a shift toward treating international standards bodies like the ITU as primary theaters for national security competition.

Connected Entities

Huawei, Development Finance Corporation, United States and 9 more
OrganizationHuawei“Cited as an example of a company posing a national security risk”Map →
OrganizationDevelopment Finance Corporation“Consulted in developing the strategy”Map →
locationUnited States“Referring to U.S. leadership and national security interests”Map →
OrganizationInternational Telecommunication Union (ITU)“U.S. must work with it to preserve technical integrity”Map →
OrganizationExport-Import Bank of the United States“Consulted in developing the strategy”Map →
PersonMrs. Kim“Co-sponsored the bill”Map →
PersonMs. Manning“Introduced the bill”Map →
OrganizationFederal Communications Commission“Consulted in developing the strategy”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Agency for International Development“Consulted in developing the strategy”Map →
OrganizationPeople's Republic of China“Linked to Huawei, raising concerns about data exfiltration”Map →
OrganizationTrade and Development Agency“Consulted in developing the strategy”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record