The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas Expands Whistleblower Protections for Public Employees Reporting Elected Officials
Last action · April 30, 2025: Received from the HouseSponsors: Chris Turner and 4 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Texas prohibits state and local governmental entities from taking adverse employment action against a public employee who reports a violation of law by an elected officer of their employing entity to an .
Public employees gain legal protection from termination or suspension when reporting unlawful conduct by elected officials, expanding existing whistleblower rules that previously covered only the governmental entity or fellow employees.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
public employees
Public employees gain legal protection from termination, suspension, or adverse personnel actions when reporting law violations by elected officers.
state and local governmental entities
Governmental entities are prohibited from taking adverse personnel actions against employees who report law violations by elected officers.
Key Facts
- State and local governmental entities are prohibited from suspending, terminating, or taking adverse personnel action against public employees who report a violation of law by an elected officer of the employing entity.
- Reports must be made in good faith to an appropriate law enforcement authority to qualify for protection.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is protected under this expanded whistleblower law?
Where must a whistleblower report the violation to receive protection?
What actions are prohibited against protected employees?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in the Senate.
Procedural history
24 actions- Apr 30, 2025SenateReceived from the House
- Apr 30, 2025HouseReported engrossed
- Apr 30, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- Apr 30, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#1006)
- Apr 30, 2025HouseFloorPassed
- Apr 30, 2025HouseFloorRead 3rd time
Show 18 earlier actions
- Apr 29, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- Apr 29, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#859)
- Apr 29, 2025HouseFloorPassed to engrossment
- Apr 29, 2025HouseFloorRead 2nd time
- Apr 29, 2025HousePlaced on General State Calendar
- Apr 24, 2025HouseConsidered in Calendars
- Apr 23, 2025HouseCommittee report sent to Calendars
- Apr 22, 2025HouseCommittee report distributed
- Apr 22, 2025HouseComte report filed with Committee Coordinator
- Apr 16, 2025HouseCommitteeReported favorably w/o amendment(s)
- Apr 16, 2025HouseConsidered in formal meeting
- Apr 14, 2025HouseLeft pending in committee
- Apr 14, 2025HouseTestimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
- Apr 14, 2025HouseConsidered in public hearing
- Apr 14, 2025HouseScheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Mar 10, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to State Affairs
- Mar 10, 2025HouseIntroducedRead first time
- Nov 12, 2024HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
