POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Montana expands tribal flexibility and educational partnerships in Indian language preservation program

Original title: Generally revise MT Indian language preservation program

Last action · May 13, 2025: Chapter Number AssignedSponsor: Jonathan Windy Boy

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Montana revises the state's Indian language preservation program starting July 1, 2025, granting tribal governments greater flexibility to partner with diverse educational entities, integrate with school district immersion programs, and utilize historical preservation materials.

Why it matters

Tribal governments gain broader authority to form educational partnerships with entities such as community choice schools, nonpublic schools, and early learning providers to advance language fluency across multiple generations.

Background
  • Article X, Section 1(2) of the Montana Constitution requires the state to recognize the distinct and unique cultural heritage of American Indians and commit to preserving their cultural integrity in its educational goals. context
  • The Montana Indian language preservation program was originally established by the legislature to support tribal efforts in preserving and perpetuating indigenous languages. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Montana tribes

Tribal governments receive greater administrative flexibility, ownership of intellectual property, and expanded partnership options for language preservation programs.

Directly affected

Office of Public Instruction

The office must collaborate with tribal governments to create guidelines, equally distribute funds, and report program metrics to the legislature.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible to partner with tribal governments under the revised program?
Tribal governments may partner with public school districts, community choice schools, nonpublic schools, tribal schools, postsecondary institutions, and early learning providers.
Who owns the cultural and intellectual property created through program efforts?
All from program efforts belong entirely to the tribe.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

35 actions
  1. May 13, 2025Senate
    Chapter Number Assigned
  2. May 8, 2025SenateEnrolled
    (S) Signed by Governor
  3. Apr 30, 2025Senate
    (S) Transmitted to Governor
  4. Apr 29, 2025House
    (H) Signed by Speaker
  5. Apr 21, 2025Senate
    (S) Signed by President
  6. Apr 12, 2025Senate
    (S) Returned from Enrolling
Show 29 earlier actions
  1. Apr 11, 2025Senate
    (S) Sent to Enrolling
  2. Apr 11, 2025House
    (H) 3rd Reading
  3. Apr 11, 2025House
    (H) Scheduled for 3rd Reading
  4. Apr 10, 2025House
    (H) 2nd Reading
  5. Apr 10, 2025House
    (H) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
  6. Mar 29, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Committee Report
  7. Mar 28, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Committee Executive Action
  8. Mar 21, 2025House
    (H) Hearing
  9. Feb 6, 2025House
    (H) 1st Reading
  10. Feb 6, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Referred to Committee
  11. Feb 5, 2025Senate
    (S) Transmitted to House
  12. Feb 5, 2025Senate
    (S) 3rd Reading
  13. Feb 5, 2025Senate
    (S) Scheduled for 3rd Reading
  14. Feb 4, 2025Senate
    (S) 2nd Reading
  15. Feb 4, 2025Senate
    (S) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
  16. Jan 31, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Committee Report
  17. Jan 30, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Committee Executive Action
  18. Jan 21, 2025Senate
    (S) Hearing
  19. Jan 21, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Referred to Committee
  20. Jan 21, 2025Senate
    (S) 1st Reading
  21. Jan 21, 2025SenateIntroduced
    (S) Introduced
  22. Jan 20, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Delivered to Requester
  23. Jan 20, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Ready for Delivery
  24. Jan 18, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Assembly
  25. Jan 17, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review
  26. Jan 17, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Input/Proofing
  27. Jan 16, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Edit
  28. Jan 16, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Legal Review
  29. Nov 14, 2024House
    (LC) Drafter Assigned

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Tribal Educational Partnerships

The legislation broadens the scope of permissible educational partners beyond traditional public schools to include community choice schools, nonpublic schools, and early learning providers.

Connected Entities

Jonathan Windy Boy, Office of Public Instruction, Montana Historical Society
PersonJonathan Windy Boy“Democrat Senator for District 16 who introduced SB 182.”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Public Instruction“Administers the program, creates guidelines, distributes funds, and reports to t”Map →
OrganizationMontana Historical Society“Houses curriculum and materials developed by tribes from 2013 through 2021.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

bills.legmt.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record