POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofZoning →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Withdrawal of Zoning Change Request for N US Hwy 41 & 4th Ave SE

Original title: Application Number: RZ-STD 24-0775 Applicant: TODD PRESSMAN Location: SE Corner of N US Hwy 41 & 4th Ave SE. Folio Number: 13939.0000, 13940.0000 & 13941.0000 Acreage: 1.97 acres, more or less Comprehensive Plan: RES-6 Service Area: Rural Community Plan: Lutz Existing Zoning: BPO Request: Rezone to CG(R) RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Hearing Master: Denial Development Services: Not Supportable Planning Commission: Inconsistent with Plan

Record date · February 11, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

A request to rezone 1.97 acres of land at the corner of N US Hwy 41 and 4th Ave SE in Lutz from to has been withdrawn by the applicant. Prior to the withdrawal, the proposal faced negative recommendations from the Zoning Hearing Master, Development Services, and the Planning Commission.

Why it matters

The withdrawal of this application means the property will retain its current zoning designation, and no new commercial development under the proposed zoning will proceed at this time.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Todd Pressman

As the applicant, the withdrawal ends his current request to change the zoning of the property.

Directly affected

Lutz residents

The withdrawal ensures the land use at the intersection of N US Hwy 41 and 4th Ave SE remains under current BPO zoning regulations.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens to the property now that the application is withdrawn?
The property will remain under its existing zoning designation.
Why was the application withdrawn?
The document does not state the reason for the withdrawal, only that the status is 'Withdrawn'.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Withdrawn.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Alignment of Review Bodies

There was a rare consensus among the Zoning Hearing Master, Development Services, and the Planning Commission, all of whom opposed the application prior to its withdrawal.

Connected Entities

TODD PRESSMAN, Lutz, Zoning Hearing Master and 2 more

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record