POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Alabama HB 52 revives time-barred civil claims for minor sex offenses for 10 years and mandates public awareness campaign

Original title: Sexual abuse of a minor; time-barred civil claims revived for period of 10 years, Attorney General required to conduct public awareness campaign, discrimination for bringing suit, prohibited

Last action · January 13, 2026: Pending Committee Action in House of OriginSponsor: Rolanda Hollis

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill revives previously civil claims for sex offenses committed against individuals who were under 19 at the time of the offense, allowing suits to be filed within a 10-year window starting January 1, 2027. It requires the Attorney General to conduct a public awareness campaign and prohibits entities from retaliating against individuals who file claims under the act. The legislation is upon the ratification of a constitutional amendment.

Why it matters

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse whose cases previously expired under the statute of limitations gain a 10-year window to file civil lawsuits for damages against both individual offenders and responsible institutions, backed by workplace protections against retaliation.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Survivors of minor sex offenses

Individuals gain a 10-year window to file previously time-barred civil claims and receive informational resources from a public awareness campaign.

Directly affected

Religious, academic, health, and youth organizations

Entities entrusted with the well-being of minors face potential civil liability for claims if their officers or employees knew or should have known of sexual abuse and failed to take reasonable prevention steps.

Directly affected

Employers and institutions

Entities are prohibited from retaliating or discriminating against any individual who files a claim under the act.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can file a claim under this bill?
Individuals who were under 19 years of age at the time a sex offense was committed against them and whose civil claims were previously may file a claim.
What entities can be sued under the legislation?
Claims may be brought against individual alleged offenders as well as entities or organizations entrusted with the well-being of minors—such as religious institutions, private academic institutions, health care providers, social service agencies, and youth organizations—whose officers or employees knew or should have known of the abuse and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it.
When does the law take effect?
The act is scheduled to become effective on January 1, 2027, but only if a constitutional amendment authorizing the Legislature to revive rights and remedies for minor sexual abuse is ratified.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseCommittee
    Pending Committee Action in House of Origin
  2. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read for the first time and referred to the House Committee on Children and Senior Advocacy

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Constitutional Contingency for Statute of Limitations

The bill explicitly ties its effectiveness to the ratification of a constitutional amendment, reflecting potential state constitutional barriers against reviving expired civil claims.

Connected Entities

Attorney General, Rolanda Hollis
OrganizationAttorney General“Required to develop and implement a public awareness campaign”Map →
PersonRolanda Hollis“Representative who sponsored the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

alison.legislature.state.al.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record