POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah Enacts Child Welfare Amendments Governing Foster Care Placements, Records Access, and Postadoption Contact

Original title: Child Welfare Amendments

Last action · March 17, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: Wayne Harper and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Utah enacts legislation modifying child welfare processes, allowing the Division of Child and Family Services to share information with the Division of Professional Licensing, updating definitions of relatives and foster parent due process timelines, and regulating s.

Why it matters

Changes how child welfare records are shared, how foster parents request reviews before a child is removed from their home, and how s are enforced in juvenile court.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Division of Child and Family Services

DCFS is required to notify parties when filing reports, adhere to new timelines for foster complaints, and follow updated relative placement and record-sharing guidelines.

Directly affected

Foster parents

Foster parents gain a lowered 12-month threshold to request juvenile court judge reviews before child removal and receive specific notice timelines regarding complaints.

Directly affected

Adoptive parents and birth relatives

Parties entering into postadoption contact agreements are subject to new statutory requirements for court approval, legal enforceability, and judicial presumptions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When can a foster parent request a review by a juvenile court judge prior to a child's removal?
If the child has been placed with the foster parents for a period of at least 12 months, the foster parents may request a pre-removal review by the juvenile court judge currently assigned to the case.
What is required for a postadoption contact agreement to be legally enforceable?
It must be approved by the court before the finalization of the adoption with a finding that it is in the best interest of the child, signed by each party claiming a right or obligation, and approved by the child adoptee if they are 12 years old or older.
How quickly must placement objections involving a relative or friend be resolved by the juvenile court?
Objections to a placement determination or actual placement with a relative or friend must be resolved by the juvenile court within 30 days of filing.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

46 actions
  1. Mar 17, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to Governor
  3. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Feb 25, 2026Senate
    Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Feb 25, 2026Senate Secretary
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Feb 22, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 40 earlier actions
  1. Feb 22, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling
  2. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
  3. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  4. Feb 19, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  5. Feb 19, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
  6. Feb 19, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  7. Feb 19, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  8. Feb 17, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  9. Feb 17, 2026House
    House/ committee report favorable
  10. Feb 13, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  11. Feb 11, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  12. Feb 10, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  13. Feb 10, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  14. Feb 10, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  15. Feb 10, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 3rd reading
  16. Feb 10, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  17. Feb 9, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd reading
  18. Feb 9, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  19. Jan 28, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0141S02
  20. Jan 28, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0141S02
  21. Jan 27, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  22. Jan 27, 2026Senate
    Senate/ comm rpt/ substituted
  23. Jan 26, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  24. Jan 26, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  25. Jan 26, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0141S02
  26. Jan 26, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0141S02
  27. Jan 22, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0141S01
  28. Jan 22, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0141S01
  29. Jan 21, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  30. Jan 21, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  31. Jan 21, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0141
  32. Jan 20, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0141S01
  33. Jan 20, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0141S01
  34. Jan 20, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  35. Jan 17, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0141
  36. Jan 15, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  37. Jan 14, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0141
  38. Jan 14, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0141
  39. Jan 14, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  40. Jan 14, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Motion succeededHouse2/19/2026Utah LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

House/ passed 3rd reading

Total

75

Yes
70
No
0
Present
0
Not voting
5
Abstain
0

How they voted (72)

48 more members
Rosalba DominguezParty not recordedyes
Angela RomeroParty not recordedyes
Carol MossParty not recordedyes
Leah HansenParty not recordedyes
Colin JackParty not recordedyes
Ariel DefayParty not recordedyes
Doug OwensParty not recordedyes
Cory MaloyParty not recordedyes
Tracy MillerParty not recordedyes
Doug WeltonParty not recordedyes
Casey SniderParty not recordedabsent
John ArthurParty not recordedyes
Jill KofordParty not recordedyes
Stewart BarlowParty not recordedyes
Tom PetersonParty not recordedyes
Stephen WhyteParty not recordedyes
Val PetersonParty not recordedabsent
Jim DunniganParty not recordedyes
Trevor LeeParty not recordedyes
Jake SawyerParty not recordedyes
Joseph ElisonParty not recordedyes
Ashlee MatthewsParty not recordedyes
Ken IvoryParty not recordedyes
Mike SchultzParty not recordedyes
Cheryl ActonParty not recordedyes
Cal RobertsParty not recordedyes
Katy HallParty not recordedyes
Jason KyleParty not recordedyes
Troy ShelleyParty not recordedyes
Carl AlbrechtParty not recordedyes
Sahara HayesParty not recordedyes
Bridger BolinderParty not recordedyes
Norm ThurstonParty not recordedyes
Jen Dailey-ProvostParty not recordedyes
Verona MaugaParty not recordedyes
Sandra HollinsParty not recordedyes
Rex ShippParty not recordedyes
Nicholeen PeckParty not recordedyes
Jason ThompsonParty not recordedyes
Dave ShallenbergerParty not recordedyes
Karen PetersonParty not recordedyes
Karianne LisonbeeParty not recordedyes
Neil WalterParty not recordedyes
Nelson AbbottParty not recordedyes
Doug FiefiaParty not recordedyes
Anthony LoubetParty not recordedyes
Hoang NguyenParty not recordedyes
Walt BrooksParty not recordedabsent
Show 5 earlier roll calls

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expanded Inter-Agency Record Sharing

The legislation broadens DCFS authority by explicitly allowing record sharing with the Division of Professional Licensing for child abuse or neglect investigations related to professional licenses.

Connected Entities

Division of Professional Licensing, Christine F. Watkins, Division of Child and Family Services and 1 more
OrganizationDivision of Professional Licensing“Utah state agency that may receive certain information from DCFS for licensing i”Map →
PersonChristine F. Watkins“House sponsor of SB 141.”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Child and Family Services“Utah state agency responsible for child welfare and foster care management.”Map →
PersonWayne A. Harper“Chief sponsor of SB 141 in the Utah Senate.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record