Resolution to End Unauthorized Military Hostilities
September 18, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This resolution seeks to limit the President's ability to use military force against specific foreign entities without direct Congressional approval, potentially ending ongoing military strikes related to drug interdiction.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Armed Forces
The military would be required to cease specific combat operations against designated foreign entities unless authorized by Congress.
The President
The executive branch would be restricted from using military force against specific foreign groups without Congressional approval.
Last recorded activity September 18, 2025.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
- The resolution directs the President to terminate the use of U.S. Armed Forces for hostilities against foreign terrorist organizations, their host states, or non-state drug-trafficking organizations.
- The mandate applies to any organization designated as a foreign terrorist organization or specially designated global terrorist on or after February 20, 2025.
- The resolution cites two specific U.S. military strikes on vessels that occurred on September 2, 2025, and September 15, 2025.
- Congress asserts it has not declared war or provided specific statutory authorization for military force against these entities.
- The resolution states that the designation of an entity as a terrorist organization does not provide legal authority for the President to use military force.
- The resolution clarifies that nothing in the bill prevents the U.S. from defending itself against an armed attack or imminent threat.
- The bill explicitly states that the trafficking of illegal drugs does not, by itself, constitute an armed attack or an imminent threat of one.
- The resolution requires the President to cease hostilities unless Congress passes a declaration of war or a specific authorization for the use of military force (AUMF).
- Congress claims it has not received sufficient information regarding the vessels struck in September 2025, including their cargo, destination, or the legal basis for the strikes.
- The resolution invokes expedited procedures under the International Security Assistance and Arms Export Control Act of 1976 for consideration.
Why It Matters
This resolution seeks to limit the President's ability to use military force against specific foreign entities without direct Congressional approval, potentially ending ongoing military strikes related to drug interdiction.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill stop the military from fighting drug traffickers entirely?
Why is Congress introducing this resolution now?
News Coverage
Voting Record
Total
99
Yes
48
No
51
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (99)
Kevin Cramer
R · no
Jeff Merkley
D · yes
Mike Crapo
R · no
James Lankford
R · no
Tim Sheehy
R · no
Deb Fischer
R · no
Ashley Moody
R · no
Mike Lee
R · no
Edward Markey
D · yes
Dan Sullivan
R · no
Richard Durbin
D · yes
Ben Lujan
D · yes
Ron Johnson
R · no
Cory Booker
D · yes
Bill Hagerty
R · no
Adam Schiff
D · yes
Lisa Blunt Rochester
D · yes
John Cornyn
R · no
Christopher Murphy
D · yes
Brian Schatz
D · yes
Eric Schmitt
R · no
Elizabeth Warren
D · yes
Jon Ossoff
D · yes
John Boozman
R · no
+ 75 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Congressional Reassertion of War Powers
The resolution represents a direct attempt by Congress to reclaim authority over military operations by explicitly defining drug trafficking as insufficient grounds for the use of force without a specific AUMF.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance90How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy85Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz60Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools