The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Louisiana House Bill 366 limits continuances for domestic abuse temporary restraining order hearings
Last action · April 27, 2026: Read by title, returned to the calendar.Sponsor: Kathy Edmonston
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Louisiana House Bill 366 restricts the of hearings on s in domestic abuse cases to a single period of 15 days, removing the exception that previously allowed further continuances upon showing .
Petitioners and defendants in domestic abuse cases face strict 15-day limits on hearing s, altering how long temporary protective orders remain active before a definitive court ruling.
- Temporary restraining orders in domestic abuse cases are designed to offer immediate, short-term protection to victims while awaiting a formal court hearing. context
- House Bill 366 was introduced during the 2026 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature by Representative Kathy Edmonston. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Petitioners in domestic abuse matters
Temporary restraining order hearings cannot be continued beyond a single 15-day period.
Defendants in domestic abuse matters
Hearing timelines and continuance options are restricted, with specific rules applied if unserved and failing to appear.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the maximum length allowed for a hearing continuance under the bill?
Can a temporary restraining order hearing be continued past 15 days if good cause is shown?
What happens if the defendant has not been served and does not show up?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House.
Procedural history
16 actions- Apr 27, 2026HouseCalled from the calendar.
- Apr 27, 2026HouseIntroducedRead by title, returned to the calendar.
- Apr 21, 2026HouseCalled from the calendar.
- Apr 21, 2026HouseIntroducedRead by title, returned to the calendar.
- Apr 21, 2026HouseNotice given.
- Apr 21, 2026HouseScheduled for floor debate on 04/27/2026.
Show 10 earlier actions
- Apr 20, 2026HouseIntroducedRead by title, returned to the calendar.
- Apr 20, 2026HouseNotice given.
- Apr 20, 2026HouseScheduled for floor debate on 04/21/2026.
- Apr 15, 2026HouseScheduled for floor debate on 04/20/2026.
- Apr 14, 2026HouseFloorRead by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
- Apr 13, 2026HouseReported with amendments (7-0).
- Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroducedRead by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
- Feb 27, 2026HouseFirst appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.
- Feb 24, 2026HousePrefiled.
- Feb 24, 2026HouseCommitteeUnder the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Elimination of Good-Cause Continuances
The bill shifts court procedure by entirely removing the judicial discretion to grant extended continuances for domestic abuse temporary restraining orders based on good cause.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.legis.la.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
- Controversy25Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
